Also: Suzy Connaughton Joins Us to Talk About Her New Book--"Like Swans"

To Login to Tonight’s Class After 6:45 PM–Click Here

Required Reading:  Opinion Piece: Can We Reform Social Security Fairly?

To restore America should we use the same biblical principles used to shape the Declaration of Independence?

They’re asking, “How did we get here?” and “How do we restore Liberty and Justice for all?” To answer these questions, we must revisit our founding document, the Declaration of Independence, to understand what defines us as Americans and why the founding generation was successful in starting a new nation.

While political historians typically highlight key events and quotes from the founding era to establish key founding principles, this lecture Mark Burrel takes a different approach. He begins by examining biblical principles that outline what God desires for nations, including the blueprint for starting and governing a nation justly.  Mark will show how the founders used this biblical template to establish America’s national covenant through the Declaration of Independence. This adherence to biblical principles was the key that enabled them to successfully separate from England and create a just and prosperous society, which their writings and speeches affirm.

Mark will also explain how America was “conceived in liberty”, as noted by Lincoln in the Gettysburg Address, protecting both religious and civil liberties while allowing everyone to go on their own personal faith journey.  Lastly, he will present a biblical roadmap for restoring America to its founding values.

________________________

Suzy Connaughton discusses her book “Like Swans” — a gripping true story of love, courage, and sacrifice set against the backdrop of communist Czechoslovakia. When Vera’s husband, Theodor, dreams of a life of freedom, he urges her to be brave and embrace change. But fear of the unknown holds Vera back, until an unexpected betrayal forces her to make a life-altering decision.

As their marriage is put to the ultimate test, the stakes are high and the consequences will affect everyone they love, especially their daughter, Zuzana. Can their love withstand the dangers of standing up against the oppressive regime? Just like the swans on the Vltava River, Theodor believes their love is eternal and their loyalty unbreakable. But in a world where trust is a dangerous currency, can they truly rely on each other?

Speaker Bios

Mark Burrel is originally from Pennsylvania and studied Engineering at Penn State. While at Penn State, he met and married Charlene, with whom he has raised four children and now enjoys the company of seven grandchildren.

For over 40 years, Mark has worked at Procter & Gamble in various roles within Manufacturing, Engineering, and R & D. He currently resides in Mason, Ohio. His passion for theology led him to a mentoring relationship with an experienced pastor, through which he delved into Systematic Theology. Mark has played a key role in founding several churches, and he has maintained a teaching ministry for over 30 years.

In the mid-1990s, Mark began exploring America’s founding principles to understand the biblical justification for the Revolutionary War. This exploration resulted in his first book, Rediscovering The American Covenant–Roadmap To Restore America, published in October, 2022. The book argues that America’s Declaration of Independence functions as our national founding covenant, following a biblical template for establishing a community or nation. Aimed at pastors and church leaders, it offers a compelling biblical argument for active Christian citizenship as a duty for believers in their communities and nations. It covers the theology behind civil government, the historical context of the American founding, the rise and influence of progressivism, answers to common questions Christians often have, and the biblical template for restoring America.

Mark’s latest book, The Duty Is Ours, provides a concise overview of what God desires for nations, including how to establish and govern a nation in a way that honors Him. It also discusses the biblical responses for Christians when governed justly or unjustly, and offers a framework for guiding a wayward nation back to God. Mark recently launched the “Liberty Talk Podcast,” where he analyzes current events through the biblical lens on the proper role of civil government.

In his leisure time, Mark enjoys restoring antique cars and hit-and-miss engines. He is also a dedicated aviation enthusiast, and he has a passion for model railroading.

________________________

Suzy Connaughton works as a flight attendant for a major airline and loves her job and the people she gets to meet. When not shopping at foreign grocery stores, she enjoys cooking, gardening, working out and birdwatching with her husband, Michael. They live in Sharonville and together have five children – Suzy’s twin sons, Teddy, and Spencer, and Michaels three girls, Bre, Sabrina, and Liv.  Like Swans began as a short story written for a creative writing class. It took over 30 years and a COVID leave of absence to turn it into the book Suzy dreamed of writing. Please find Suzy on the web at suzyconn.com.

What is the proper Balance Between Work and Family Life?

Bahnsen’s Groundbreaking Book argues that Work is the Meaning of Life!

Author and Chief Investment Officer David Bahnsen has come out with a groundbreaking book that attempts to paint the proper picture between work-family balance.   In his book, “Full Time”, Bahnsen argues that work is the meaning of life.   It offers a theological argument that rejects the crucial errors that have led to such a low view of work today.   The book dares to suggest that we have unhappy people not because we are working too much, but rather that we have unhappy people because they have been cut off from the purpose and earned success that work offers.

Our society faces a crisis of alienation rooted in a deterioration of purpose, community and dignity.   Through an understanding of work that is properly formed, we discover our purpose, we create community, and we reveal our God-given dignity.   We ignore and even disparage work to our personal and collective peril.

Bahnsen asserts in the book that God made the human race in His image as a creator, producer, and innovator—making us co-creators with Him.   The modern social construct says work is something we do that we will not have to do it any more, envisioning a thirty-year vacation or a “second half of significance” as the ultimate aim.  That self-defeating idea and systems of thought underlie this destructive vision and is the target of this book.

Full Time is for those who need to hear the good news:  we are made to work, make, serve; success is significant, purpose and meaning area available to all because a life fully committed to work is a life well-lived.    Join David Bahnsen as he discusses his important book.   David will be talking from 7:30-8:20 PM.

_________________________

EmpowerUAmerica.org’s Managing Board Member Dan Regenold brings us up to date with his discussion about the Federal Debt and Deficit.   Dan has been providing us a regular update on the Budget of the US Government since 2015.

Tonight:  Dan will give us the results of our Federal Budget in 2024 and bring us up to date on the myriad of programs proposed by our Presidential candidates.    How much will Trump’s programs cost like:  Lowering the Corporate Income Tax from 21% to 15%?  How about ending taxes on overtime?   The much discussed tax on tips?  And for seniors, the End of Taxation on Social Security Benefits?

Kamala Harris has her own programs like raising corporate tax rates to 28%, raising taxes on capital gains, expanding the child tax credit and expanding aid for senior care.  How much will major increases in affordable housing and lowering prescript drug cost?

You’ll walk away from tonight’s class with a crib sheet on where we are at and if it is possible to fix this debt/deficit problem.  The United States is NOW  SPENDING 50% more that we take in.  Is such a path sustainable?   Is there a fix that would work?   Join Dan from 7:10-7:30 and learn.

_________________________

Speaker Bio

David L. Bahnsen is the founder, Managing Partner, and Chief Investment Officer of The Bahnsen Group, a national private wealth management firm with offices in Newport Beach, New York City, Bend, Nashville, Minneapolis, Austin, Phoenix, and West Palm Beach, managing over $5.7 billion in client assets.

Prior to launching The Bahnsen Group, he spent eight years as a Managing Director at Morgan Stanley and six years as a Vice President at UBS. He is consistently named one of the top financial advisors in America by Barron’s, Forbes, and the Financial Times. He is a frequent guest on CNBC, Bloomberg, Fox News, and Fox Business, and is a regular contributor to National Review. He hosts the popular weekly podcast, Capital Record, dedicated to a defense of free enterprise and capital markets.

Bahnsen is the author of several best-selling books including Crisis of Responsibility: Our Cultural Addiction to Blame and How You Can Cure It (2018), The Case for Dividend Growth: Investing in a Post-Crisis World (2019), and There’s No Free Lunch: 250 Economic Truths (2021). His newest book, Full-Time: Work and the Meaning of Life, was released in February 2024.

David’s true passions include anything related to USC football, the financial markets, politics, and Chinese food. His ultimate passions are his wife of 22+ years, Joleen, their children, Mitchell, Sadie, and Graham, and the life they’ve created together on both coasts.

________________________

DanRegenold  is a lover of Liberty and enjoys speaking to EmpowerU classes about subjects he is passionate about.  Recently he has discussed:  Milton Friedman, Saul Alinsky, D-Day, The Deficit, Public Education, Winston Churchill, President Theodore Roosevelt, Thomas Sowell, Sam Adams and Pearl Harbor at EmpowerU Classes.     For Dan’s full biography–Click Here.

John O'Neill also to Discuss One of America's Great Founders--John Hancock

President of the Cincinnati Lawyers Chapter of the Federalist Society Joins EmpowerU to Catch Us Up on the Important Supreme Court

We live in consequential times. The United States Supreme Court recently issued a series of high-profile decisions over a wide range of issues such as presidential immunity and the power of Federal agencies.

Join Joseph Ashbrook of the Federalist Society as he discusses some of these decisions, including one seismic (though potentially less well known) opinion that returned power to the people and could have as great of an impact on American government as any decision in close to a century. Mr. Ashbrook will also discuss attacks on the Court, the consequential times in which we live, and the Court’s historic contribution of (real) progress toward our American ideals.

________________________

John O’Neill teaches important information about one of our most important founding fathers John Hancock.    Hancock was an American Founding Father, merchant, statesman, and prominent Patriot of the American Revolution.    He was the longest-serving president of the Continental Congress.    Why was Hancock so important in the nation’s found and what was up with that large signature?

_________________________

Speaker Bios:

Joseph Ashbrook is president of the Cincinnati Lawyers Chapter of the Federalist Society.  Founded in 1982, the Federalist Society promotes the principles that the state exists to preserve freedom, separation of governmental powers is central to our Constitution, and it is the province and duty of the judiciary to say what the law is, not what it should be. 

Mr. Ashbrook was the editor-in-chief of the Virginia Law Review and currently practices at the law firm Ashbrook Byrne Kresge LLC, an agile boutique that seeks to level the playing field for those pursuing the American Dream. The firm provides outside general counsel and litigation services to entrepreneurs, local governments, and closely held businesses, and engages in public interest litigation.   Joey can be reached at jashbrook@ashbrookbk.com, or 513-582-7424.

__________________________

In John O’Neill’s 35 year professional career he has participated in and managed people and projects in the corporate as well as the consulting services industry. His professional background includes significant career experience in a broad spectrum of business disciplines including sales of technology resources, corporate and consulting services management, software development and personnel training.

New Evidence of a Government UFO Crash Retrieval Program

Did JFK know about a UFO crash retrieval program?

In 1984 a UFO researcher was given film containing photographs of what appeared to be UFO-related classified government documents.  These documents purportedly show that the US government had a group that retrieved crashed UFO vehicles, that this group reverse-engineered the alien technology, and that JFK wanted to share our knowledge of UFO’s with the Soviet Union.  These documents are known as the MJ-12 documents, and they remain controversial, with experts today still debating their veracity.

In the past eight years, interest in the MJ-12 documents has been rekindled by two events which support the claims made in the documents.  The first event is the 2017 release of the now-famous Tic Tac video by The New York Times, which supports the claim that the government knows about UFO’s.  The second event is David Grush’s 2023 UFO whistleblower testimony, which supports the claim that the government does indeed have a program that retrieves UFOs, and then attempts to reverse-engineer their technology. 

Now, this year, more evidence supporting the claim that these government programs exist has emerged.  In August an Australian man named Geoff Cruickshank released a trove of documents that further corroborate the MJ-12 documents.  Mr. Cruickshank, a security and electronics professional who has designed and installed classified documents skiffs for the Australian and US governments, obtained these documents from the publicly available US National Archives.  Mr. Cruickshank will share these documents with us, and he will discuss their corroboration of the MJ-12 documents, and their relevance to the broader UFO debate.

______________________

Danzil Monk, is a Brooklyn-based podcaster, author, and blogger, and he will share his insights on how Black Americans are likely to vote in the November election. Danzil has been following the polls closely, and he will give his take on what they are telling us about Black voters. He’ll also share how black voters are viewing Harris as a candidate. And he’ll react to former President Obama’s recent public chastising of young Black male voters for not supporting Harris for President. Danzil helped EmpowerU organize its spring, 2024, episode on how Black Americans are being impacted by the open borders, and we welcome him to his first appearance at EmpowerU.

______________________

Speaker Bios

When Geoff Cruickshank was 10 years old his father built him a Newtonian reflector telescope.  Geoff says it was through this telescope that “…the vastness of the Universe was impressed upon me from an early age.”  This realization inspired him to contemplate whether intelligent life existed elsewhere.

Geoff’s research using the US National Archives digital collections has uncovered documents that support existing evidence indicating the US government knows about UFOs, and has a program for retrieving and reverse-engineering alien craft technology.  He recently has begun sharing his findings online and in interviews.

Geoff, a security and electronics professional, operates a consulting firm called Industrial Automation and Security.  He has designed and installed high-security skiffs — rooms used by government officials to review top secret documents — for the US and Australian governments.  He holds a Bachelors Degree in Information Technology from Charles Darwin University, and he has earned certifications in operations, security, and risk management.  He resides in Northwest Territory, Australia.

______________________

Danzil Monk spent 29 years as a college administrator and communications supervisor. He is the Founder of News Christian View, an online Christian news blog, on which he has published over 30 articles. He is the producer and host of the Probe Analysis podcast. Danzil volunteered for 25 years at 98.7 WRKS Kiss FM, and WBLS NY, on the number one Black talk show, The Open Line. His Substack account is “Danzil Monk Sr.”

______________________

The Experience of a WWII Nurse Anesthetist

Lessons Learned & Relevance Today

Very little had been published about the contributions nurse anesthetists made during World War II. 

Neither the Veteran’s Administration, nor historical societies, kept any records about the contributions made by nurse anesthetists during World War II.  Sadly, most of the women who served in this capacity are no longer alive to tell their stories.

After researching the story of one nurse anesthetist, 1st Lt. Adeline H. Simonson, Carolyn Nicholson, CRNA, BS Ed, will discuss the impact nurse anesthetists made during the war, as well as the experiences and dangers Simonson and other nurses endured while serving with a 400-bed Med Evac Hospital in the European Theater during WWII.   Carolyn Nicholson will be speaking from 7:30-8:30 PM.

________________________

The yard signs, mailers, and campaign speeches absent during an election season are the names, philosophies, and opinions of persons seeking to serve as Ohio magistrates.  Magistrates are appointed judicial officers who serve many of the same functions as an elected judge. They preside over juvenile, domestic relations, probate, common pleas, and municipal matters.

What, then, is the difference between a judge and a magistrate?  Hear that and more in a twenty-minute refresher about magistrate duties, numbers, professional requirements, and examples of their impact.  Hear George Brunemann talk about the duties, appointment, and impact of Ohio magistrates.  George will be speaking from 7:10-7:30 PM.

Speaker Bios:

Carolyn Nicholson, CRNA, BS Ed, graduated from the Cincinnati General Hospital School of Nurse Anesthesia in 1972. After graduating, Nicholson remained on staff at the University of Cincinnati (UC) Nurse Anesthesia Program as a clinical and didactic instructor for 42 years. She later obtained her BS Ed from UC in 1986, and she continued teaching at UC Medical Center until her retirement in 2014.  Throughout her career she was an invited speaker at local, state, national and international nurse anesthesia professional meetings. Nicholson’s involvement in alumni activities and teaching, and interest in history, have continued in her retirement from clinical practice.

________________________

George Brunemann is an engineer with 45 years of experience and over a dozen patents. He has defined the “State of the Art” in multiple areas with innovative use of Artificial Intelligence and software architecture. His consulting company has worked with several of the Fortune 500 and has a reputation for accomplishing “mission impossible” projects that were high risk, high reward.  In late 2009, the rapid increase in the United States Debt and the march toward socialized medicine drove George to enter the political conversation. He and his wife Nancy opened their home to over 40 friends and neighbors to discuss a shared concern over the future of our country. That group grew to over 400members and in 2012 George was president of the 20,000 member Cincinnati Tea Party.

The Brunemann family was audited in early 2012 as part of the IRS targeting of conservative groups and individuals. George has been interviewed by local reporters, as well as appearances on Fox News and Fox Business Channel.  In 2021, George started a new effort–RestoreLiberty.US–to provide commentary, coordination and information on current events and local activities.  As we enter the critical 2024 Election, RestoreLiberty.US is actively working to get conservative candidates elected at all levels of government.

How much does oil play a part in our everyday lives?

Oil has been known to man for a long time as a substance that sometimes oozed to the surface of the ground or a lake; oil has only been put to use by man since its discovery in the 1850s in Pennsylvania.

Oil first changed the world by providing a cheap way to light the night in the form of kerosene – a change that likely saved the whale from extinction.  With kerosine people were now free to stay up after the sun went down. More efficient and cleaner than coal, oil quickly found other uses.

Even bigger changes came with the development of the internal combustion engine and the arrival of cars, airplanes, and diesel-powered ships and locomotives. Beginning in about 1900 the acquisition and use of oil became a matter of wealth, national security, economic growth, and modern living.  During WWI and WWII, acquiring oil, and denying it to the enemy, became a crucial wartime strategy.  Since then we have witnessed the rise of OPEC, the oil shocks of the 1970s, the first Gulf War of 1990, and the revolution brought about by fracking and directional drilling. While wind, solar, and other renewables may be more benign for the environment, we are nowhere close to replacing oil and gas, especially when you consider that they are used to produce plastics, synthetic fibers, and fertilizer. Oil is simply required for much of modern life.

Much of the information for this talk is derived from the Pulitzer Prize-winning The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money, and Power, by Daniel Yergun.  Mr. Yergun is currently Vice Chairman of S&P Global, and one of the world’s leading authorities on oil.

Speaker Bio:

Tom Hagedorn is a life-long learner who has been researching and talking about the many facets of western socialism and progressivism over the last five years. He has previously given the following talks at EmpowerU: Socialism in the U.S.: A Brief History; ESG: Introducing Our New World Government; American Education and Its Takeover by International Socialism; and Climate Calamity: Climate Change Exposed.

Tom is a member of the EmpowerU Board.  Tom has been providing investment advice to individuals since 1983, and he has been involved in various political, charitable, and community activities.  He holds a B.S. (cum laude) and an MBA from the University of Cincinnati, and he is a CPA and a CFP.

Can We Effectively Transition To 100% Renewable Energy?

Do you think wind, solar, and batteries can replace the hydrocarbon fuels that power our modern industrialized society?

Author Steve Goreham will discuss why the Net Zero agenda―a forced transition to renewable energy―is costly, dangerous, and destined for failure. Using science, economics, and in-depth analysis, he will expose the weaknesses in the planned green energy transition, and explain why he believes the move to renewable energy will fail.

Mr. Goreham — author of Green Breakdown: The Coming Renewable Energy Failure — will discuss all facets of the proposed green energy transition, including hydrocarbon and renewable energy, biofuels, power plants, home appliances, electric vehicles, ships, airlines, heavy industry, carbon capture and storage, and the hydrogen economy.

Speaker Bio

Steve Goreham is an informative and engaging speaker, delivering compelling and provocative programs to businesses, universities, and diverse organizations. He’s an effective communicator in the board room, lecture hall, and on the debate panel.  His areas of expertise include energy, industry, agriculture, the environment, sustainable development, economic trends, climate change, and corporate environmental policy. 

Mr. Goreham’s books include Climatism! Science, Common, Sense, and the 21st Century’s Hottest Topic (New Lenox Books, 2010), The Mad, Mad, Mad World of Climatism (New Lenox Books, 2012) Outside the Green Box: Rethinking Sustainable Development (New Lenox Books, 2017) and Green Breakdown: The Coming Renewable Energy Failure (New Lenox Books, 2023).

He serves as the Executive Director of the Climate Science Coalition of America, and as a policy advisor for The Heartland Institute.  He holds an MBA University of Chicago, and a BS and MS in Electrical Engineering from the University of Illinois.

Alzheimer's is the most common form of dementia. It causes problems with memory, thinking and behavior.

Dementia is not a specific disease. It’s an overall term that describes a group of symptoms.

Alzheimer’s is not normal aging. It is the most common form of dementia and a degenerative brain disease.  It is a disease of the brain that causes problems with memory, thinking and behaviour.      Join the Alzheimer’s Association of Greater Cincinnati Chapter to learn about 10 common warning signs and what to watch for in yourself and others.  If you have an older parent, or are a caregiver this class is important for you to attend.

In 2023, as many as 6.7 million Americans—or 1 in 9 age 65 and older– were living with Alzheimer’s disease.  This number if projected to nearly triple to 14 million people by 2060.  Almost two-thirds of American’s with Alzheimer’s are women.   Older Black Americans are about twice as likely to have Alzheimer’s or other dementias as older whites.  Worldwide, 55 million people are living with Alzheimer’s and other dementia.

This one-hour program at EmpowerU covers typical age-related changes, common warning signs of Alzheimer’s how to approach someone with memory concerns, early detection, the benefits of diagnosis and the diagnostic process.  Also, the resources for help that are available at the Alzheimer’s Association will be discussed.  The Alzheimer’s part of this program will be from 7:30-8:30 PM.

________________________

Do you want to convey an idea, teach, or encourage others in a public speaking scenario?  Listen to some tried and true methods to help you communicate clearly before any size audience.  You’ll be given encouragement and tools to help you communicate via public speaking without fear, fainting or knocking knees!

________________________

Speaker Bios:

A talented volunteer of the Cincinnati Chapter of the Alzheimer’s Association will be speaking with us tonight.   The Vision of Alzheimer’s Association is to end Alzheimer’s and all other dementia—by accelerating global research, driving risk reduction and early detection, and maximizing quality care and support.

The Alzheimer’s Association is the leading voluntary health organization in Alzheimer’s care, support and research.  Their vision:  A world without Alzheimer’s and all other dementia.   Learn More about Alzheimer’s Association at www.alz.org.

________________________

Karen is an avid reader, writer, learner, wife, and mother of two. She has worked in IT as a technical writer for over 30 years and is currently working full-time in IT.  Outside of her paying job, she has given multiple public speaking engagements on various topics, she serves as president of her Toastmasters International club as well as served as a volunteer Community Educator for the Alzheimer’s Association

We'll speak with 3 American Jews about their experiences

The attack on a Pittsburgh synagogue in 2018 killed 11—

…marked an escalation in the seriousness of antisemitism in America.  More lethal attacks followed in 2019, and the overall number of antisemitic incidents has since grown steadily.

However, the outbreak of the Israel-Hamas War has opened the floodgates of American antisemitic acts, including vandalism, harassment, hate speech, anti-Israel protests on college campuses, and public calls for the annihilation of the state of Israel.

In this episode of the EmpowerU podcast we’ll speak with several American Jews — a student, a parent, and a community leader — about how this rise in American antisemitism is impacting their lives, and what can be done to stop it.

Michael Mercier shares unique insights about Elvis' life and music

“The presence this man had — you couldn’t talk, nobody did anything.  You just stopped and watched him.” (Shelley Fabares, Elvis’ Co-Star)

The Internet has given us access to an infinite amount of documentary material regarding Elvis Presley.  Michael Mercier has spent untold hours analyzing this material, and he has generated wholly unique insights about Elvis.

Using video and audio clips, photographs, and written documents, Michael will share his insights, including the following:

• How Elvis’ foray into rock ‘n roll was an accidental digression from his primary interest in singing ballads and gospel.
• How Elvis systematically applied his own formula to black rhythm and blues songs to transform them into his own style of rock.
• How Elvis had a palpable, sometimes overwhelming, energetic aura described by countless friends, fans, celebrities, and others in the music business.
• How Elvis expressed an elevated aesthetic sense in many areas of his life.
• How Elvis possessed a remarkable intellectual drive.
• How Elvis’ ’68 Comeback and Aloha Via Satellite TV specials stand as remarkably unique achievements in American television history.
• How the claim that Elvis was a racist is an absurd lie.

Join us early at 6:30 PM.   We’ll be having appetizers, desserts, wine and beer to share.  Sign up to bring an appetizer or dessert if you can–email us at info@EmpowerUAmerica.org.  Social starts at 6:30 PM.

________________________

Speaker Bio:

Michael Mercier has been an Elvis fan since first grade. A self-described “Elvis Connoisseur,” he has spent a lifetime studying and researching Elvis. His research has included discussing Elvis with members of Elvis’ family and circle of friends, as well as with authors of books about Elvis, through email and social media. At the age of 23 he made a road trip with his dad from Boston to Graceland, and years later he visited Graceland with his own son. While in graduate school he did an Elvis impersonation at the school variety show. He prefers to listen to Elvis’ music from the 1970’s.

To Login to Tonight’s Class After 6:45 PM–Click Here

Required Reading: In your discussions with friends between today and the election, if the topic of 2020 election fraud comes up you can share with them Peter Navorro’s summary report on election fraud.  

Colonel Mills lays out a game plan for how individuals can contribute.

The term “The Deep State” refers to the community of federal employees who remain in place while successive presidential administrations come and go every four years.   Over time, members of the deep state develop their own policy agenda.  When that policy agenda conflicts with the current administration, then deep state actors may work nefariously to keep their own agenda on-track. 

In the past several years we’ve heard of several examples of this, including the FBI’s suppression of information about Hunter Biden’s laptop, the implementation of Operation Crossfire Hurricane to frame Donald Trump as colluding with Russia, and the Biden White House’s work with Silicon Valley to censor information about COVID vaccines. 

Such deep state actions undermine the will of the American people.  For this reason, Presidential candidate Donald Trump has stated his intention to dismantle the deep state if he is reelected.

In his recent book, Colonel John Mills provides a battle plan that individuals can follow to assist in dismantling the deep state.  It’s a battleplan that involves not guns or bullets, but, rather, ballots and voices.  Join us as we discuss with Colonel Mills his book “War Against The Deep State.”   

Speaker Bio:

Colonel Mills delivers significant experience in DoD and DHS cybersecurity, technology, and critical infrastructure programs. He has worked extensively in train and equip efforts using Foreign Military Sales, foreign military financing, ITAR, and international military education and training, and builds public-private defense and technology industrial base partnerships, including helping establish the DoD’s Development Innovation Unit in Silicon Valley.

Prior to joining The SPECTRUM Group (TSG), Colonel Mills served as the Director for Cybersecurity Policy, Strategy, and International Affairs in the Office of the Secretary of Defense. His work included creating and implementing the first DoD and intelligence community scorecarding initiative, boosting whole-of government cybersecurity and multidomain responses to threat actor and nation hostile actions.

Colonel Mills’ 33-year U.S. Army and Army Reserves career culminated in his serving as a senior liaison between DHS and DoD for complex homeland security operations. Earlier, he helped establish and advise foreign national military and security forces in Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Bosnia, South Korea, and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. His roles spanned joint and inter-agency operations, psychological operations, intelligence activities, special operations, strategic planning, and public affairs.

In addition to his work at TSG, Colonel Mills serves as an adjunct assistant professor for the Cybersecurity Law and Policy program at the University of Maryland, Global Campus.

Rob Tuttle argues that we don't

Required Reading: “25 Governors Demand Answers on How Many
Migrants Flown to States” by Bethany Blankley.

In recent years there has been a nationwide movement — Convention of States — to promote another Constitutional Convention.

The Convention of States would introduce several new constitutional amendments that the U.S. Congress has been reluctant to entertain.  Convention of States advocates say this is the perfect situation to hold such a Convention. 

Rob Tuttle is a conservative who is an outspoken 10^th Amendment advocate, and he believes that the Federal Government has gone far beyond its proper boundaries.  However, his considerable research has led him to believe that another Constitutional Convention would be a very dangerous idea and is not worth the risk — especially since we have not pursued other avenues that were recommended by our Founders.

________________________

Mary Hill is running for Hamilton County Clerk of Courts. She will bring much-needed changes to the position. Presently, it is falling short in the service it provides to the Hamilton County taxpayers and the court staff daily. She believes accessibility and reliability are key components to a fair and impartial outcome for all

________________________

Speaker Bios:

Rob Tuttle has been actively involved in politics for more than 20 years.  He has been elected 3 times to the Warren County Central Committee, and he is a volunteer lobbyist for a number of non-profits across the state, including Dayton Right to Life. 

Shortly after retiring, Rob go to know government officials at all levels, including U.S. and state congressmen, senators, mayors, school board members, and his local sheriff.  He has had tough conversations with these officials about numerous topics, including the 2^nd Amendment, fiscal restraint, and a variety of federal and state constitutional issues. 

Rob teaches classes on the Constitution across Ohio, both as a member of Building Blocks for Liberty and the Institute on the Constitution, focusing on the serious problem of government overreach and fiscal irresponsibility. Rob has testified in Ohio House and Senate hearings about various pieces of legislation, including Convention of States, and is an active participant and speaker at many Tea Party and liberty groups throughout the Dayton area. Rob believes the Constitution is a powerful instrument of protection for all Americans, regardless of political leanings – and we should protect it and follow it.

________________________

Mary Hill grew up in the downtown area of Cincinnati. She recalls living on every street in the downtown area. When her mother had to choose between paying the Catholic school tuition or paying the next month’s rent, she moved. Her mother worked two jobs, but like in today’s economy, it was hard for a single mom to make ends meet.

Mary attended Robert A Taft High School. She later attended America College to become a Certified Financial Planner. Her focus was Taxation. She was employed by Prudential Insurance where she obtained her Ohio State License to sell Life, Health, P&C, and Securities. She managed the Payroll/Human Resources Department for 14 years for a division of Nielsen Research. She retired from a local Insurance company after 11 years as an Internal Wholesaler of financial securities. Mary is the mother of two wonderful children.

Mary served eight years on Council in the Village of Woodlawn. She chaired the Finance Committee and Economic Development. Her first year on Council, she recovered $100,000 from overpayments on the Village’s loan. Her main focus was to clean up the Ohio Audit Report. Additionally, Woodlawn Council built 43 new homes in the village and just recently completed a beautiful park that was initiated during Mary’s tenure.

Mary has traveled the world and knows that the United States is the best place in the world to live. She is running for the Clerk of Courts position because she believes the citizens of Hamilton County deserve better accessibility and complete transparency of court records.

Our next election will be pivotal

This Class is Sponsored by Betty Overstreet

To Login to Tonight’s Class After 6:45 PM — Click Here

Required Reading:  Matt Taibbi:   Freedom of speech isn’t just a legal right, but a way of life. On its history — Click Here

Half or more of the nation is fearful about the direction in which the United States is headed.

We have high inflation, unprecedented illegal immigration, riots in our cities, an increase in crime throughout our nation, cancel culture, a biased and untruthful media, and an assassination attempt on a former president who is also a presidential candidate. DEI and wokeness are destroying our children and communities. Our “Democracy” is under assault, our “freedoms” are under assault. If America continues on its current path, it will cease to exist as we know it. 

 As the nation prepares for a crucial vote that many call a turning point, an informed electorate is crucial. Do not miss this opportunity to learn from Edwin Black, a NY Times bestselling and award-winning author known throughout the United States and Europe. Black is closely monitoring the issues here and throughout the Middle East that are changing on a daily and weekly basis, and he will answer questions on national fears and national affairs.   Edwin Black will speak from 7:25-8:25 PM

_________________________

Friend of EmpowerU Jack Atherton talks about his new Podcast “The Big Picture with Jack Atherton.”  Also, Jack will share with us a few thoughts about the upcoming election.  Jack Atherton will speak from 7:10-7:25 PM.

Speaker Bio:

Edwin Black is the award-winning, New York Times bestselling international investigative author of 200 award-winning editions in 20 languages in 190 countries, as well as scores of newspaper and magazine articles in the leading publications of the United States, Europe and Israel. With more than 2.2 million books in print, his work focuses on human rights, genocide and hate, corporate criminality and corruption, governmental misconduct, academic fraud, philanthropy abuse, oil addiction, alternative energy and historical investigation.

Editors have submitted Black’s work thirteen times for Pulitzer Prize nomination, and in recent years he has been the recipient of a series of top editorial awards. He has also contributed to a number of anthologies worldwide.  He hosts the weekly Edwin Black Show. Black’s eleven award-winning bestselling books are IBM and the Holocaust (2001 and 2012), Financing the Flames (2013), British Petroleum and the Redline Agreement (2011), The Farhud (2010), Nazi Nexus(2009), The Plan (2008), Internal Combustion (2006), Banking on Baghdad (2004), War Against the Weak (2003 and 2012), The Transfer Agreement (1984 and 2009), and a 1999 novel, Format C:.

_________________________

Jack Atherton- , former anchor at FOX19 and WLWT, and friend of EmpowerU will join us. After anchoring and reporting in San Antonio and Miami, Jack helped start The Ten O’Clock News on Cincinnati’s FOX19. 

During his 15 years there, it was among the highest-rated primetime newscasts in the country.  Jack also contributed columns to Cincinnati Gentlemen magazine and taught a course on the history of electronic media at the University of Cincinnati. Jack has discussed the Media at EmpowerU sessions in the past.

The Crime of the 19th Century with J.T. Townsend

To Login to Tonight’s Class After 6:45 PM–Click Here

Required Reading: Access today’s required reading here: A Master of Laughter: 3 Pointers From Ronald Reagan for Us Today.  

Just Five Days After The Civil War Ended…

It was the crime of the 19^th century and spawned one of the most notorious trials in American History.  President Abraham Lincoln was gunned down by actor John Wilkes Booth while attending Ford’s Theatre. The assassination has always been examined by historians as an act of political post-war terrorism, committed by a fanatic who the Confederacy may have sponsored. But rarely has Lincoln’s death been investigated by detectives as a murder case.

Watch JT Townsend discard the myths and legends surrounding the assassination while excavating the truth about the conspiracy to kill Lincoln. With stunning images and riveting content, the author of “Queen City Notorious” and “Queen City Gothic” solves the mystery that still surrounds the death of our most beloved president.

Ford Theater–April 14, 1865

Speaker Bios:

J. T. Townsend is a freelance writer, armchair detective, and lifelong resident of Cincinnati. He is the author of the 2009 regional best seller Queen City Gothic and 2014’s Queen City Notorious, and his work has appeared in the Cincinnati Enquirer, Cincinnati Magazine, Word Magazine, Crime Traveler and Clews. He has presented over three hundred programs in the Cincinnati area as part of his True Crime Lecture Series, including Jack the Ripper, Lizzie Borden, and the Lindbergh Kidnapping, and teaches his Cincinnati True Crime Detective class for the University of Cincinnati Communiversity division.

 In 2018 he was featured on WCPO News, 700WLW Radio, and the Cincinnati Enquirer while promoting his new book Summer’s Almost Gone, which is now a regional bestseller! In 2020 he appeared on WLWT News with Sheree Paolello.

_______________________

Where do we stand as we enter the campaign's final month?

To Login to Tonight’s Class After 6:45 PM — Click Here

Required Reading: “Replacement migration” is often dismissed as a baseless, racist, right-wing conspiracy theory.  Did you know that the United Nations published a plan in 2000 titled “Replacement Migration”?  –Click Here

The 2024 presidential race has been packed with shocks, drama, and reversals. 

On the Republican side we witnessed Democrat prosecutors indict Trump for numerous alleged crimes, only to have their cases fall apart. We saw the Secret Service commit a series of keystone cops-like errors that resulted in a nearly successful attempt on Trump’s life, followed by a second thwarted attempt at Trump International Golf Club in Florida. And we saw Trump select Ohio’s own JD Vance — a junior senator who once opposed his policies — to be his running mate.

Official portrait of President Donald J. Trump.

President Joe Biden’s official portrait.

And we saw RFK, Jr., challenge Biden in the Democratic primary race, subsequently declare himself to be an independent candidate, and then ultimately suspend his own campaign and join the Trump campaign.

Where does the race stand as we head into its final month? Hours before the vice presidential debate, when Republican candidate JD Vance takes the stage to debate Democrat Tim Walz on October 1, we’ll get the scoop from Breitbart’s Washington Bureau Chief Matt Boyle, who has interviewed Donald Trump and JD Vance numerous times this election cycle and who has his finger on the pulse of the polls, the media (and its bias) and the momentum for each candidate.

Speaker Bio:

Matt Boyle oversees Breitbart’s coverage of the Biden administration, including uncovering the corruption, scandals, and failure running rampant through the White House and government. He also leads Breitbart’s 2022 midterm election coverage, supervising efforts to vet candidates and track major stories in districts and states nationwide.

He joined Breitbart News Network just after the 2012 election, following a successful stint at the Daily Caller, where he broke stories on Fast and Furious and corruption in the State Department.  Though not always a conservative – he voted for Obama in 2008 — Boyle began to lean right as he watched the way the media and political establishment treated the Tea Party.  “I saw decent, honest people falsely accused of being racists,” he says.  As he grew into his conservative chops, he withdrew from a Masters in Journalism program at American University, finding the professors, “too leftist.”  

In 2015 Boyle assumed the role of political editor.  His reporting and that of his team was essential reading for understanding the rise of Donald Trump, key ground-shifting deals such as the USMCA,  the Middle East peace push, and overall accomplishments of the Trump presidency.  As political editor and now as bureau chief, Boyle leads his team in exclusive interviews and narrative-setting reporting that elevates an agenda some in Washington hope to dodge — standing up to the Chinese Communist Party, reining in Big Tech, and fighting corruption in American politics, no matter which side of the aisle.  

Boyle serves as radio host on Breitbart News Saturday, 10 a.m.–1 p.m. Eastern, SiriusXM Patriot Channel 125.  He’s also a weekly guest on America First with Sebastian Gorka, on podcastrepublic.net.

Also, Todd Zinser discusses Cincinnati Connected Communities

To Login to Tonight’s Class After 6:45 PM — Click Here

Required Reading:  Tim Walz Things Your Kids Belong to the Public School System — The Federalist

Cincinnati Enquirer history columnist Jeff Suess will present on the early settlement of Cincinnati…

Cincinnati Enquirer history columnist Jeff Suess will present on the early settlement of Cincinnati.  The pivotal moments in the history of the Queen City follow along from the indigenous mound builders to the development of the first American city after the Revolutionary War.  You’ll hear about Daniel Boone and George Rogers Clark, the Symmes Purchase, Fort Washington, and the blossoming of a western river town into a meat packing Porkopolis and one of the most influential cities of the mid-nineteenth century.

         Daniel Boone

The timeline is multifaceted, exploring politics and race, the arts and pop culture, while also unveiling Cincinnati’s role in the Underground Railroad, the spread of Reform Judaism, and the development of the polio vaccine.

Cincinnati in the 1800’s

The people of Cincinnati have an insatiable curiosity about their history. More so, it seems, than many other cities. Maybe that’s because we feel Cincinnati is underrated, overlooked by the rest of the nation, and we seek reassurance.   Jeff Suess will be speaking from 7:30-8:30 PM.

________________________

Cincinnati Connected Communities

Cincinnati “Connected Communities” explained:

1. Information describing the essential elements of “Connected Communities,” which is a zoning reform based on principles collectively known as “upzoning.”  Such reforms have been introduced in numerous cities across the country, heavily influenced by ideology and partisanship.

2. Description of the process used by Cincinnati in enacting Connected Communities which has generated strong criticisms across the city, as deficient and illegitimate, because of its failure to address affordable housing as well as its serious lack of honest community engagement.

3. Current efforts by a citizens’ coalition to repeal Connected Communities.

Why is Connected Communities important for you to learn about?   Because it is eerily similar to EmpowerU Classes where we have learned about “The Great Reset”.   This Connected Communities is coming to your Town, Village or City.   Make sure to join us for this.   Todd Zinser will be speaking from 7:05-7:25 PM.

Speaker Bios:

Jeff Suess is a history columnist and librarian at the Cincinnati Enquirer, as well as the author of several books on local history, including Lost Cincinnati, Hidden History of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Then and Now, and Cincinnati: An Illustrated Timeline. He also has written on wider topics, such as Disneyland’s Tomorrowland and the Cincinnati Bengals and San Francisco 49ers football teams. Jeff grew up in Modesto, California, and graduated from San Francisco State University. He lives in White Oak on Cincinnati’s West Side with his wife, Kristin, and their daughter, Dashiell.

________________________

Todd Zinser is a Cincinnati native and resides in Cincinnati’s West Price Hill neighborhood. He retired as Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Commerce after 31 years of conducting audits and investigations of federal officials, programs, and operations. Other career highlights include serving as Deputy Inspector at the U.S. Department of Transportation. He also served as Transportation’s Assistant Inspector General for Investigations in Washington D.C. and Transportation’s Special Agent In Charge in New York City. He has testified more than thirty times before Congress. He is an expert on government oversight and compliance and remains a Certified Fraud Examiner.

How might US foreign policy toward Iran change in 2025?

To Login to Tonight’s Class After 6:45 PM — Click Here

Required Reading:  Iran tries to join Brics a new Economic Alliance which includes Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.

Iran threatens US interests on several fronts. 

Iran competes with Saudi Arabia, an important US ally, for dominance in the Middle East.  Iran supports a network of anti-West terror groups, including Hezbollah and Hamas.  Iran maintains close ties with America’s biggest threats in the Western Hemisphere, helping socialist Venezuela refine its oil and offering key geopolitical support to Cuba and Nicaragua. In Asia, Iran is leveraging its newly minted membership in BRICS to strengthen ties to China and turn it into a more vocal antagonist to Israel, another key US ally in the Middle East.

Iran has come into focus recently as its confrontations with Israel over the Israel-Hamas War have flared.  These tensions threaten to draw the US into direct conflict with Iran.  It’s therefore critical that US foreign policy toward Iran minimize the risk of such conflict.

Frances Martel, International Editor at Breitbart News, will share her assessment of Iran — its current influence in the Middle East, its role in the Israel-Hamas conflict, the foreign policy toward Iran we can expect from a Donald Trump or Kamala Harris administration, and what impact their differing approaches could have on the region in the foreseeable future.  

Speaker Bio:

It was while working for Mediaite that Martel had her first interaction with Andrew Breitbart. “It was hard to keep up with Andrew’s brain — he was rapid fire. He hated elitism, hated the idea of an ivory tower of rich, white liberals telling the rest of us what to believe,” she says. “I clicked with that.”

It clicked for her so much that in 2013, she joined Breitbart News Network as free-lancer and quickly rose through the ranks, becoming its International Editor. Her expertise includes Latin America, China, Africa and the Middle East, and religious persecution globally.

Martel’s writing has been cited across the political spectrum, from Rush Limbaugh to Lawrence O’Donnell.  She holds a BA in Government studies from Harvard University, and a JD from Fordham University School of Law. 

Also: Orlando Sonza Talks About His Run for Ohio Congressional District #1

NOTE: If you have an encounter that requires you to use lethal force, and you would like expert legal representation by attorney Sean Maloney, visit www. secondcalldefense.org and use offer code “empower” to get the first month free. 

——————————

Own a gun? Do you understand what a “reasonable man” standard means?

The use of lethal force is justified only under conditions of extreme necessity as a last resort, but did you know that just touching a gun might be considered lethal force. “Stand Your Ground” means something different in every state, if you are a gun owner make sure you know the laws of your state. Did you know that you may be judged by a “reasonable man” standard? What does that mean, and does it mean something different in every state?

Own a gun or thinking about buying one? Join us for this class as Attorney and gun law expert Sean Maloney from Second Call Defense will break it all down for us by reviewing the basic concepts of lethal force, how they are interpreted by the legal system, and what it all means for you as a gun owner.   

Make sure you leave this class knowing the 5 Universal Concepts all gun owners must know.  Sean Maloney will speak from 7:30-8:30 PM.

________________________

As an Assistant Prosecutor in Hamilton County, Orlando understands the importance of focusing on real crime prevention. As a former military officer, he knows what it takes to keep our nation safe. And as a son of immigrants, Orlando can speak to the importance of securing our southern border while at the same time working to fix our broken immigration system so that immigrants can come here safely and legally and pursue the American dream just like Orlando’s family. 

Orlando Sonza joins EmpowerU from 7:05-7:25 PM to talk about his run for Ohio Congressional District #1 and what differentiates him from sitting Congressman Greg Landsman.    Congressman Landsman was invited to attend this event, but has chosen not to.

Speaker Bios:

Sean Maloney

Sean Maloney is a licensed Ohio attorney with a firearms legal practice emphasizing Gun Rights.  He practices in all areas of firearm-related law in both state and federal courts, including 2nd Amendment rights, criminal defense related to federal and state firearms charges, federal and state restoration of gun rights, National Firearm Act issues, federal firearms license representation, state lawsuits to enforce violations of Ohio’s preemption laws, and federal background Form 4473 NICS appeals.

Sean is a criminal and civil firearms consultant and has appeared as an expert witness in a variety of civil lawsuits related to firearms. He is also a national speaker on topics related to the 2nd Amendment, self-defense, lethal force, and concealed carry.  

Sean co-founded Second Call Defense (www.SecondCallDefense.org), a national organization that provides complete legal protection for armed self-defense, with thousands of members in all fifty states. 

_________________________

Orlando Sonza is proud to be an Ohioan. A second generation Filipino American, Orlando was raised in New Jersey and attended the United States Military Academy at West Point.  While there he met his wife, Jessica, a Mexican/Filipino American, fellow Academy classmate, and Cincinnati native. 

Orlando graduated top ten in his class at West Point where he majored in political science and minored in systems engineering. Upon graduation, he and Jessica both commissioned as second lieutenants in the U.S. Army. Orlando served on active duty as an Infantry Officer and a Finance Officer with the 3rd Infantry Division at Fort Stewart, Georgia. 

After leaving active duty, Orlando and Jessica moved to Cincinnati to raise a family. While helping to raise their kids, Orlando obtained his master’s degree in taxation from the University of Cincinnati and his law degree from Georgetown Law. 

Orlando is an Ohio CPA with experience working in Big 4 Accounting as a senior tax accountant. While in law school, he was a legal intern at the U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal & Tax Divisions. Orlando currently works at the Hamilton County Prosecutor’s Office. 

Orlando and Jessica currently live in Springfield Township with their four children.

Transcript

So we’ll get on to our first speaker for tonight. Orlando Sanza is proud to be an Ohioan, a second generation Filipino American. Orlando was raised in New Jersey and attended the United States Military Academy at West Point. While there, he met his wife, Jessica, a Mexican Filipino American. Fellow Academy classmate and Cincinnati native, Orlando graduated top 10 in his class at West Point, where he majored in political science and minored in systems and engineering.

Upon graduation, he and Jessica both commissioned as second lieutenants in the US Army. Orlando served on active duty as an infantry officer and a finance officer with the 3rd Infantry Division at Fort Stewart, Georgia. After leaving active duty, Orlando and Jessica moved to Cincinnati to raise a family.

While helping to raise their kids, Orlando obtained his master’s degree in taxation from the United States. From, I’m sorry, from the University of Cincinnati and his law degree from Georgetown Law. Orlando is an Ohio CPA with experience working in Big Four accounting as a senior tax accountant. While in law school, he was a legal intern at the U.

S. Department of Justice, Criminal and Tax Divisions. Orlando currently works at the Hamilton County Prosecutor’s Office. Orlando and Jessica currently live in Springfield Township with their four children. Please welcome the next first congressman, the first congressman of the first district, Orlando Sonsa.

Good evening, everybody. Thank you. Empower you for for hosting us this evening. It’s great to see some familiar faces. Yeah. And, uh, some, some new faces in Dave and Karen. Congratulations, Karen. Your new book there, uh, like Betty said, I’m Orlando Sansa, uh, proud to call myself in Ohio. And this is this is my home.

Uh, now my wife, Karen. You can call it home much longer than I can, but as Betty explained, how do you have a Jersey boy meeting a Cincinnati girl, but you can’t make it up as classmates at the United States Military Academy at West Point. Uh, so, you know, I, I just want to share with you just briefly for if we have not had the privilege of meeting, uh, who Orlando Sonsa is just much deeper, uh, not what he is.

Okay. Because at the end of the day, uh, if you live in the first district, but really any district, you’re ultimately going to be showing up on election day to fill up a ballot, uh, and voting for a person and simply because they may have a letter attached to their name may not necessarily mean that they align with your values.

Uh, at the end of the day, we vote person. And, and so in a nutshell, this is who really Orlando Sonsa is. Bio, uh, aside first and foremost is I am a Christian. Uh, I am, I am unapologetic about that. I certainly don’t impress that on anyone. But, uh, I live by 1 Peter 3, 15, my life first. It says, always be prepared to give an answer to anyone who asks you.

To give a reason for the hope that is in you. But only do this with gentleness and respect. So I’m a Christian. Number two is that I’m a proud husband to an amazing wife. Jessica, I was telling, uh, Nicole back there, uh, from Clifton that Jessica is, uh, Cincinnati made because she knows the answer to the question.

Where did you go to school? It’s not where to go. Where’d you go to college where you went to high school? Jessica is a product of public education system. Just like me. Although we can’t say the same for how public education is now. Uh, but she is a proud graduate of Wynton woods school district. She’s the first female graduate of when woods to go to West point.

Uh, so she not only serves her family. Day in and day out her husband and our four Children, but she has proudly served this country, and I’m so proud of her. And this is a team effort. She is right now, as we speak, in ballet rehearsal with our nine year old and two year old daughters. I can’t do this without her, and I love her as my best friend and my partner.

11 years. No end in sight. Uh, third is that I’m a proud father of four kids all under the age of 10, two, four, six, and nine, two girls, two boys. Us Republicans call that a gender jackpot. Democrats a little confused, make whatever they want. Uh, but our kids are our lives. Uh, they’re the reason why I’m running for this seat because.

If things do not change for our country, then the future that they will inherit is a broken economy that’s going to leave them and their family bankrupt. It’s going to be a less safe community that they’re going to raise a family in, or attempt to raise a family in. They’re going to inherit a continuously indoctrinating, not educating education system.

And an America that, on the global stage, will continue to be perceived as weaker and weaker and weaker instead of stronger and stronger and stronger. And so the reason why I’m running is because I’ve determined that the best way to serve my family right now is to serve my country as well. And my fellow Americans that reside right here in Southwest Ohio, they’re my motivation.

So a Christian, a husband, father, very closely in tandem is that I’m a Patriot and I’m a conservative. Here’s what it means for me to be a Patriot. Is that I have, I have the incredible blessing to say that I’m a product of a legal immigration system, a legal immigration system, the only way it should be the right way.

It should be the fair way. I was born in the Philippines, moved here when I was three years old, moved to America alongside my older sister, April and my parents, Orly and Susan to do what, to pursue the American dream. And they told me then at a young age, And throughout my early childhood, and even now in adulthood, that this, America, is the greatest country in the world.

And she is worth fighting for, and she is most certainly still worth dying for. And so when you’re instilled with those values growing up as a kid, you are motivated by them. Motivated so much so, right, to, uh, commit. In high school, that there’s only one place I want to go when I graduate, and that is at the United States Military Academy to not just be this thing called an army soldier, but I want to be an army leader.

I want to go to the premier leadership institution in the world that trains. and inspires future leaders of character in our U. S. Army. I want to do that. The first time I stepped foot on the plane at West Point, an hour away from where I lived in northern New Jersey, I knew this is the place I want to go.

Of course, best thing that happens to me as West Point at West Point is meeting Jessica, my wife, right? So that patriotism flows in her veins as well. Not just mine, a Patriot. Lastly, equally as important is that I’m a conservative and proud of it. And this is what conservatism means to me. It simply means that the fundamental rights and liberties that we share as Americans, life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, that it is government’s role to protect those rights.

Beyond that, you are exceeding the scope of our constitution. So I believe that government has enumerated rights, enumerated, listed, very specific rights, nothing else. If we exceed those bounds, we cease to be the America that our founding fathers envisioned. Also, it means that through your own hard work, not through someone else’s hard work, your own hard work, your own work ethic, your own aspiration, your own decision to pursue a higher education, a good job, that is all done by your effort.

No one else’s effort. And that by your labor, you get to chart your own path. Not by someone else’s effort, That then is benefiting you. No, we have the ability in America to be yes. Individuals can proudly say that it’s through, again, your own effort. That you can chart your own future. That’s the beauty of America.

Only in America, right? Only in America. So those foundational principles that we have fundamental rights that are endowed by our creator and that government should protect those rights, not infringe upon them, not expand on them. And that we as individuals have a right to defend ourselves. We as individuals have a right and a duty and a responsibility, uh, to stand up for things that are true.

Like life and the value of it. So conservative principles, you know, growing up, I thought those were Asian American principles, Filipino American principles. Those are conservative American principles. And those are the principles and values that is going to correct the course of this country, because the alternative we have seen in the last four plus years is taking our country, changing the azimuth into a completely wrong direction.

That’s going to destroy us from within, economically, security wise, education wise, national security wise, and value wise, as well. So that’s, that’s who Orlando Sanza is. A Christian, a husband, a father, a patriot, and a conservative. And that’s the message that we’ve been delivering to the people right here in the First District.

And I will tell you, friends, it is a resounding message that people are accepting, with open arms, And are saying, yes, this is also what I believe in. And they may be people that have for the longest time adopted a completely different worldview, but a complete different set of principles. Longtime Democrats saying in neighborhoods that typically Republicans don’t go into, but yet we have gone into our team has gone into my family and our four kids have got into deep into the urban core in Cincinnati and saying, Sanza, we voted for you for state Senate in 2022.

We’re going to vote for you again because you’re gonna fight for us with the values that we believe in as well. Love of God, love of family, love of country, a gun again, conservative principles. So we have a message. We certainly have a story to tell now to just give you an update on this race for those that are keyed in is that, uh, we pulled this race last week alongside, uh, the National Republican Campaign Committee in D.

C. And if we continue to deliver the message and continue to do what we are doing on the ground, polling says we are five points ahead. Ahead in this race

in a district that is indexed by the pundants as a democrat plus two percent leaning district. So we’re five points ahead. We just need to continue to deliver the message. 41 percent of the african american vote is what we have according to this poll. Again, if we continue to deliver the message doing things that our conservative movement has struggled with in the past, how do you connect with other areas?

of the population. You just simply show up and you tell them what your values are and ask them. Do you share those values? Never mind titles and letters and names. Do you share the values that I share? Never mind color or gender. Do you share the values I share? So the poll is yes, certainly surprising in a good way, but not letting up.

We have a little over 45 days. And you can bet my wife and our four kids and our entire team and our, our great supporters from all around the district from Del High to Clifton to Mason and Springboro are going to continue to show up. We’re going to continue to turn out and continue to be united in this effort to take back this seat.

So thank you so much for letting me just share with you about my story. More about the race. I certainly do want to open it up to questions if that’s okay. That’d be okay. Um, anyone, please, anybody got any questions? Please state your name and your questions. The mic, please. My name’s Carl, and I was wondering what your opinion is on this issue that’s going to be on the ballot pertaining to redistricting.

There’s, they’re talking about having 5 Republicans on the committee, 5 Democrats, and 5 Independents. The thing that concerns me is my neighbors are all, are Independents, but they’re really closet Democrats. So, I could see a conflict of interest there. Thank you for the question. Um, here’s the thing about issue one.

It claims to be an anti gerrymandering initiative, but if you actually read the language that’s actually right now being litigated, uh, it is a gerrymandering initiative. And here’s why. You talk about a conflict of interest. You should be asking the question why the majority of the resources, the majority of the dollars that are supporting, uh, this ballot initiative is not just coming from out of state.

It’s coming from out of country. If there is such an interest in Ohio for changing the way, and I will be the first to admit that the way that we draw districts can be better, most certainly. But the way to change it is not this, because that is the definition of outside special interest groups that are trying to impact the way that we do business here as Ohioans.

Okay, so that’s number one. That should, that should be a red flag for me for any initiative. Whether it was issue one last November, right? We knew that that was a push for special interest. from outside country outside of state. But the same for this as well. But substantively, when it comes to this redistricting initiative, because at the end of the day, trying to take out, you can never take out politics from redistricting.

I mean, by definition, that’s what redistricting seek to do seeks to create, uh, lines that then elect Politicians and our elected officials. It is very hard to draw districts, uh, that comply with. laws, let alone our laws here in Ohio and leaving it up to legislators. So what do the legislators do? They hire consultants.

They are consultants that have the computer software that can then draw those lines. Because at the end of the day, it’s it comes to statistics and numbers and taking census data, compiling that, analyzing that and then drawing lines. The question is who who is going to be these consultants? When there’s already a, a small pool of consultants already that are keyed in on redistricting itself, uh, and it was consultants that battled with each other, uh, in just in 2022 with our redistricting mess, that there’s still going to be involved.

So it still doesn’t solve the underlying issue of who the actual map drawers will be. Uh, so from that standpoint, if you’re going to solve our redistricting issues that we have in the state. Uh, well, why don’t we first actually think through where the funding sources are going to be from that initiative and what their, uh, intent is for funding.

And then number 2 is how we’re actually going to draw these maps now, from what I’ve seen now, I haven’t done the deep dive, but just from what I’m hearing in that, if this passes. What districts will actually look like you will have districts that take, uh, cities and completely stretch them out to also include districts that are far and wide in slivers around the state.

Uh, how in the world does that achieve compactness? That just that that is a judicial mandate by our Ohio Supreme Court. That’s just one example. It doesn’t achieve that. And our Ohio Supreme Court said districts must be as compact as they can be. But if you’re taking not just one district, but multiple districts, and making them look like a salamander or a gerrymander, then it begs the question, is this actually achieving our judicial intent, our legal intent in the state?

So those are my, those are my rough thoughts. But I’m not the expert on the issue. I believe someone else will be speaking on that issue. Yes. Okay. Do we have any other questions? There was this, uh, I guess issue one where before the abortion thing where they said, Oh, uh, they’re only having this issue one to stop.

Uh, to make it harder to change the Ohio constitution in order to, uh, stop the abortion rights to get on our constitution. And so we lost that issue one, and then they did the abortion thing. Is there a way to get that limiting the, uh, Changing of Ohio Constitution by a higher percentage. Sure. So, to change our Ohio Constitution requires a series of steps.

The first step is to get signatures, uh, sufficient enough. I think it’s for 400, 000, uh, sufficient enough to bring it before the ballot board and put it on the next ballot for a constitutional amendment. We can do that at any time as Ohioans. We reserve that right under our Constitution to be the ones that wield the power to change our Ohio Constitution.

Uh, but again, that’s just one part. The second part is how do you get the message out? For that initiative again. How do you even have the sufficient and enough support initially to get those signatures? Well, there has to be a system in place, a team in place and resources in place to get that message out.

So it’s not that we can’t do it again, but it’s is there the will to do it and the resources to do it now? I will argue that Uh, if we stuck to the message in that August ballot initiative, that it’s just crazy to think that our, uh, U. S. Constitution has been amended a fifth of the amount of amendments that our Ohio Constitution has been amended.

Our Ohio Constitution has been amended over 140 times. You know, there should be a much greater threshold than the 50 percent plus one that we have right now. So will we see that again? Perhaps. I hope so. But I don’t think that we’re going to see it. Most certainly not in this November. But when we see it next year, it comes down to will, resources, and infrastructure to get that message out.

I just want our audience to know that we tried to put together a debate with Orlando and Lansman. And uh, Lansman didn’t even have the courtesy to say I’m busy or whatever it was, why he didn’t answer. But that’s okay, because Orlando went to Lansman’s turf on Monday night and he won the debate. That’s right.

Thank you, Betty.

Good note, good note to end on and and that just speaks to again the contrast, right? Is that we are not afraid to go anywhere to deliver a message Even if it’s in the middle of Amberley village at the Jewish Center against a Jewish American opponent that we don’t certainly Cast aspersions on but we know and they know that that was home turf for him but Let’s just say this is that I know that empower you would have been as gracious and accommodating and kind as the Jewish center was for us.

My question is to my opponent. Why won’t you reciprocate the same? Deliver your message. Don’t be afraid to try to defend your record in these last 20 months. He certainly didn’t do that on Monday, and I’m sure he would have failed to do that here, but at least show up, uh, answer questions, and, uh, if you’re afraid that there’s going to be more Republicans in a room than you’ve ever experienced before, well, maybe you shouldn’t be the U.

S. Congressman for the 1st District, but thank you, Betty. Thank you, thank you, Thank you for coming. I think he’s afraid of Orlando.

Okay, we’ll get on to our next speaker. Sean Maloney is a licensed Ohio attorney with a firearms legal practice emphasizing gun rights. He practices in all areas of firearm related law in both state and federal courts, including Second Amendment rights, criminal defense related to federal and state firearms charges, federal and state restoration of gun rights, Rights, National Firearm Act issues, federal firearms license representation, state lawsuits to enforce violations of Ohio’s preemption laws, and federal background form 4473 NICS appeals.

Sean is a criminal and civil firearms consultant and has appeared as an expert witness in a variety of civil lawsuits related to firearms. He is also a national speaker on topics related to the Second Amendment, self defense, lethal force, and concealed carry. Sean co founded Second Call Defense. Um, website is second call defense dot org, a national organization that provides complete legal protection for armed self defense with thousands of members in all 50 states.

Please welcome Sean Maloney. Can

everybody hear me? We have enough sound.

I’m sure you’ll take care of it in the back. I want to apologize ahead of time. Uh, I’m suffering from vertigo for the first time in my life. So you’re all spinning a little bit, but I’ll get through it. So don’t panic if I should collapse and fall, just make sure I haven’t hit my head real hard, but I’ll be all right now as an attorney, I have to kind of give you this disclaimer.

Uh, I’m ethically bound to do it. My name is Sean Malone. I’m an attorney, but not your attorney. If you need specific advice, please contact an attorney located in your jurisdiction. The information provided during this seminar is for informational entertainment purposes only, and not for the purpose of providing legal advice.

So if you guys need anything outside here, feel free to call me. I have cards on the back all the way out, uh, and I’ll be happy to talk with anybody at any time also. Now, there’s three websites I’d like you to try to remember. Type into your phone, uh, One is secondcalldefense. org, which has a wealth of information on it for gun owners, uh, legal and otherwise.

And then, of course, Ohioattorneygeneral. gov. I’m assuming that we have a large percentage of gun owners. and concealed carry holders in the room. They update the Ohio handbook for concealed carry on a regular basis. And I encourage everybody to take a look at that monthly because there’s changes. We change the laws, the gun laws in the state of Ohio, uh, on a regular basis.

I’m legislative director for Buckeye Firearms Association. And in my spare time, that’s probably all I do. And then this one is an important website for people who do carry. And travel from state to state under reciprocity or just want to know what other states gun laws are, especially the ones that touch us, West Virginia, Kentucky, and Indiana.

Uh, that’s handgunlaw. us. That’s a great website and I always pass that one out because All the police departments use that in their cruisers. If they have any questions about somebody from out of state or any questions about gun laws, they always use handgunlaw. us. It’s a great one. I know the individuals that run that.

They’re a group of attorneys and it’s always kept up to date. I’ll have some related information and definitions that, uh, we’ll talk about in the beginning so we’re all on the same page. We’ll talk about what is lethal force. Um, and I’m not going to ask. Who carries a gun, who has a gun, who owns a gun. I always say that’s none of my business.

I understand your business, but, uh, for some reason, my mother called me today and want to know how many gun owners are in America. Uh, I, I sensed that she was online and she’s in a, a Facebook feud with somebody. That’s just what I think. And I said, 400 million. So there’s more than one firearm for every man, woman, and child in the United States.

And there’s probably over at one time, there was over 130 million households with guns, and I’m sure that’s increased. Uh, so gun owners certainly aren’t a minority. So lethal or deadly force is a force likely or intended to cause death or great harm. So when we think about using deadly force, uh, we have to think about the fact that, uh, it’s likely, not necessarily likely or intended to cause death, but certainly death may be a result, and the fact that you used lethal force or someone used lethal force against you, and you didn’t die, doesn’t really make a difference either.

The key words that you’re going to hear over and over from me is I was in fear of death or serious bodily injury or harm. Uh, I don’t have to know that the baseball bat that crashes against my shoulder or crashes against my forearm is, is going to cause me great bodily injury or harm. The fact that it may and has the ability to, uh, is really all I need to use lethal force.

Certainly it’s reasonable to think that, uh, uh, Swing a baseball bat or a frozen bag of squirrels, uh, striking me in the head, uh, could cause death or serious bodily injury. And I always use the example of frozen bag of squirrels because, uh, in San Francisco, and, uh, actually in Nancy Pelosi’s district, a gentleman used a frozen bag of squirrels to kill his neighbor.

They were in an argument over a fence. There’s been more killings over fence disputes than you can imagine. My first capital murder case was a dispute over a farm fence. Well, this gentleman and his neighbor were fighting over a fence, and apparently he was a squirrel hunter and had a frozen bag of squirrels in the freezer.

So he brought that out and used it as a weapon. And I always say, look around. Anything can be a weapon. It could be a firearm, could be a pen, a pencil, a frozen bag of squirrels, a car, a baseball bat, anything. So when you think about that and when you’re preparing for things and you think about lethal force, anything potentially can be a weapon against you.

And I always tell people, especially in today’s day and age, uh, you need to pay attention to your surroundings and, uh, not look at your telephone, your cell phone and text as you’re walking down the street, because that may be your biggest mistake.

Burden of proof or self defense law, It was changed in 2019, and I know 2019 seems like a long time ago, but to me it just happened. As I was going over this, I gave this same seminar in 2021, and so I was going over the seminar, and it’s unbelievable the amount of laws that have changed in that short amount of time.

They’ve all been good, they’ve all been federalist laws, they’ve all expanded our right to keep and bear arms, and they’ve all protected us as citizens, uh, uh, Uh, to do the same. So it was changed in 2019 for self defense cases. It was changed. It used to be now keep in mind the good guys and good girls with a gun.

Who used a gun in self defense? What does the law call you? The defendant. Someone kicks your front door open, wielding a knife, sprints up your stairs, you’re forced to use lethal force to protect your family, and you’re the defendant, and they’re the victim. You have to be something, so that’s the way it starts off, and I always tell people that, because some people are surprised when they hear that.

Certainly I was. I was, uh, I’m an NRA instructor also, and a criminal defense attorney, and I was reading the Attorney General handbook, and they kept saying defendant, defendant, defendant, while I’m used to saying defendant, but then one time I said, wait a minute, I’m the defendant? That’s ridiculous. So, know that and get over that.

So, if there’s evidence now, and we change that, and That was one of the first things I wanted to do because we were the only state in the United States that had that left on our, on our books. We were the last state to change the burden of proof for the affirmative defense of self defense. I think West Virginia may have been the last state to do it before us, somebody nearby, but we were the last ones and the state representatives and senators didn’t believe me.

I was talking to senators and representatives that were prosecutors and they didn’t believe me. And I’m saying, boy, I’d like to open up your books and see what we can reverse, but, you know, that’s the case. So now, if there’s evidence that tends to support that a person accused of a crime used force and self defense, the burden shifts to the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they didn’t.

So if there’s any evidence that tends to support, now, I was in a meeting. Uh, when the senator came up with a language that tends to support and I cringed because to me that’s what’s tends to support me and that’s a lawsuit and there has been several, uh, and, uh, lawsuits on that, but they kind of cleared that out.

So keep in mind when you have an affirmative defense of self defense, essentially, you’re saying. I did it, but it’s like it’s like my kids excuse my kids defense. Yeah, dad. I did it, but so it’s I did it, but and we’ll talk about more about that later. So, what happens is the burden shifts to the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused did not use force and self defense or defense of another or defense of one’s residence.

And the statutory reference is 2901. 05, it sets forth the burden shift. If there is evidence that tends to support that a person used self defense, then the jury will get a self defense jury instruction. The biggest problem now we have in Ohio law, and there’s several, uh, senators and representatives are trying to change this, is that if I bring a client to trial and I’m pleading self defense, for whatever reason, I’ve admitted everything, and I’ve admitted that Uh, that he pulled the trigger or that used the baseball bat or whatever they did in lethal force to protect themselves.

And yet, the judge feels that there’s not enough evidence that tends to support, the jury never hears about self defense. So I just essentially Admitted everything that my client did to prove the crime and he’s not going to get a self defense, uh, During instruction that’s being changed and several other states have the law You have a pre trial hearing early on to determine just the issue of self defense and then as you move forward You know what you’re litigating for your client.

So that’s something that’s kind of ongoing kind of inside baseball now this is from the uh The Attorney General Yost’s office, in Ohio, deadly force can be used only to prevent serious bodily harm or death. Deadly force can never be used to protect property only. Depending upon the specific facts and circumstances of the situation, the use of deadly force may lead to criminal charges and or civil liability.

And that’s in the latest, uh, Ohio concealed carry law handbook. And that’s important to know. Uh, in the state of Ohio and in most states, there’s, there’s some, uh, exceptions, but in most states, you can never use lethal force or deadly force or really physical force in protection of property. A long, long time ago in a cat, in the case of cat go versus Briley, the United States Supreme court decided that human life is more valuable than any piece of property.

And that came about when, uh, Mr. Briley. Uh, had a old farmhouse, he was born in that farmhouse, built another house beside it, and people kept breaking into that farmhouse. So he got sick and tired of people breaking into his old homestead and taking whatever was in there. So he decided to set up a spring loaded shotgun in the front door, so whoever, you know, It’s Johnny, I’m home, and a shotgun went off, and that’s when that case was decided.

So always remember that human life is always more valuable than any piece of personal property. And that’s that case that’s set forth that, and that’s where this comes from under Ohio law and most other states. Deadly force can be used only to prevent serious bodily harm. That is why your response to the question, Why did you use a firearm?

Why did you shoot? Why did you strangle? Why did you punch her, him, the teenager? Why did you kill the teenager? One, one answer. I was in fear of death or serious bodily injury or harm. That’s the only reason we as law abiding citizens use lethal force. Why? Cause I was in fear of death or serious bodily injury or harm.

I used to say, practice saying over and over and over again, because I’ll talk about the psychological and physiological, uh, uh, body changes to a threatening encounter and how, if you don’t memorize that and you don’t know how to make a nine one call, God knows what’s going to come out of your mouth and we’ll talk about the reason for that shortly.

Some people, and I, I, as an entering instructor, I taught concealed carry for years, self defense in the home and home firearm safety. I always wonder how many people go home, put their gun in the nightstand and never touched it again. Or how many people have left the class, but never really think. When are they allowed to use a firearm in self defense?

I can tell you as law abiding citizens in this room, and good girls and good guys with guns, you wait too long. Because we’re good people. And so we always wait too long. But you need to think about when can you use a firearm in self defense? And essentially that comes down when you’re subjectively, it doesn’t matter what I think, or what your neighbor thinks, but when are you personally in fear of death or serious bodily injury or harm?

Then your use of lethal force is justified. But how do we convey that To the jury, certainly we can say, well, subjectively, I was in fear of death or serious bodily injury or harm. And that’s what we’re going to talk about tonight. What comes next? How do we prove to the jury that we’re a reasonable person and we properly and reasonably use a firearm of self defense?

You know, I’ve said, I promise you, if you don’t memorize and practice, and we’ll go over the 9 1 1 call. You’ll have no idea what you’re saying. I can give you examples, and I will. I’ve had clients say some amazingly stupid things in the past. They have no recollection of saying it. How’s a sign to a 911 operator when a husband and wife are unlocking their front door?

Husband and wife are attacked, husband is knocked to the ground, being beat, grabs a firearm, fires a warning shot, which is the last thing you want to do. Finally fires another shot, hits the attacker in the leg. Uh, so what do a good husband and wife do? They call 911, and what’s the wife do? She applies direct pressure to the guy that tried to kill him.

So the husband’s putting his gun away, and um, you hear him screaming in the background, You son of a bitch! You’re bleeding like a stuck pig! I should have shot you again! He has no recollection of saying that. The police did the investigation and they, they cleared him. I said, there’s no problem. Two days later, the 911 operator was listening to the tape, gave it to the prosecutor.

Prosecutor indicted him for murder. I was a consultant that case three years later, a bankruptcy, a foreclosure on their house and a divorce later, you know, he was finally acquitted, but that was mostly because he had the wrong attorney, but people didn’t understand. And it’s important to understand the psychological aspects.

of a threatening encounter and what’s going to happen, and that’s why I throw this in here, although it’s not legally related, it’s more medical, but I’m going to want you to know.

I was in fear of death or serious bodily injury or harm. Why do I say you have no idea what would come out of your mouth after a self defense situation? Because of our natural physical and psychological and voluntary responses to a threatening encounter. We have no control over what we say. We have no control over what we’re going to hear.

We have no control over what Over the tunnel vision, we have no control over what we remember. Almost everything we’ve been involved in, a fight for our lives, can come into evidence. Everything can come into evidence under one of the seven exceptions to the hearsay rule. The one that’s going to kill us and get us is always the excited utterance.

Oh my god, I shot him, I killed him. Well, it’s said directly, immediately after the incident. And so the court thinks, well, you didn’t have time to Have a plan to be deceitful. So it’s an excited on earth. We’re gonna let it come in. But now medically, we know that anything that we say after we’re involved in threatening encounter probably isn’t true.

Not because we’re not lying, but because of what’s just happened. We have no idea what happens. And that’s what we’re going to go over. So really, It’s an exception to the rule against hearsay, the excited utterance, but with medical science, the way it is today, it shouldn’t be an exception based on what we’re going to talk about.

Uh, and the excited utterance is created by common law based on hundreds and hundreds of years of doctrine. Uh, stuff from the 16 and 1700s in England is where most of the common law comes. Um, But so everything we’re going to say immediately after the incident is mostly untrue again. Like I said, not because we’re lying, but because of what’s going to happen.

So what happens even before we consciously recognize. that we’re in trouble or that we’re in danger? Well, unconsciously, unconsciously and involuntarily, norepinephrine is dumped into our body. It’s a neurotransmitter released from the sympathetic nervous system in response to stress hormone, uh, referred to as stress hormones.

Sympathic nervous system triggers a response that is commonly referred to as our fight or flight response. We’re gonna, we’re either gonna fight, stand up, or we’re gonna run and gonna take off. That’s all that energy. When we are faced with a situation that is potentially dangerous, we need to decide either to stay and face whatever we find intimidating or scary, or to turn and run away as fast as we can.

Both options require our body to work faster and better, this is where the norepinephrine comes in. Did you know that in order to make your body work more efficiently, now this is all what our body does without us even trying. It causes several changes in our body function. These include the following.

An increase in the amount of oxygen going to our brain. Helps us think. Makes things clearer. Helps us move quicker. An increase in our heart rate. This pumps more blood around our body, helping our muscles work faster and more efficiently. An increase in glucose, or sugar. This additional sugar gives our muscles something to feed on, which helps them work better and faster.

It increases our breathing rate. When we breathe faster, we’re delivering more oxygen to the body and the brain. This helps our entire body work better. The shutting down of the metabolic process, shutting down processes like digestion, growth, it all allows blood and energy that would normally go to these functions in the human body to go to the muscles in the brain.

Adrenaline rushes and an extremely intense chemical change takes place. Adrenaline is a natural hormone that is produced by the body and secreted through the body when you undergo some type of traumatic experience. For instance, if you’re attacked by a dog or in a car accident, or you get in a fight.

You notice the energetic feeling that gives you the power and strength to either escape or attack. When your adrenaline gets out of your system, you start shaking. You, someone’s been in a car accident and they have, they’re busted up. You know, they have a broken arm, broken leg, but they feel no pain. It kills the pain transmitter.

Uh, adrenaline does a lot of those things. It gives you a notable increase in your strength. People who go underneath, go under that adrenaline rush during a major emergency have known to do some crazy things. They lifted cars off children, you know, they’ve jumped, they did some amazing things, and that’s all from the adrenaline.

Uh, No feelings of pain and adrenaline rush can also be used to protect your body from pain. Heightened senses of awareness from your vision to your touch to your senses will all be dramatically heightened when you undergo adrenaline rush. Sudden boost of energy, increased breathing, all of what I just described causes distorted perceptions of time or slow motion and distorts distances, causes tunnel vision, auditory exclusion, just to name some.

Now tunnel vision, I’m being attacked. The only thing I can see is the gun. The only thing I can see is a knife. I can’t see the other 12 people. I don’t know that I shot 13 times. The police says, how many times you shoot? I say twice. And it’s not because I’m, I’m being facetious or lying. I have no recollection.

And I probably never will have a recollection. Or if it does happen, it’s going to happen sometime later. How many people in here know that, uh, when the police are involved in a, in a shooting that their union and their attorneys don’t let them make any statements for at least 48 hours? We’re expected to talk immediately under that same situation, and we’ll go over why we don’t, and why it’s really the only time I can really tell somebody to shut up.

So if I tell you to shut up, it’s a good thing. Typically after your body releases the adrenaline, only when you need it. However, if you’re suffering from the extreme adrenaline rush and you have to talk, I always tell people to practice four square breathing. When you breathe, and it’s good too if you’re getting your blood pressure taken, four breaths, four second breath in, hold it for four seconds, out for four seconds.

Hold it. And for four seconds, if you do that for about 30 seconds to a minute, you will be relaxed and it will calm you down. Uh, I do it in a lot of different occasions and I, and I first learned that in the concealed carry class. All of these conditions, which are great if you’re in a fight, if you’re, if you’re turning into a K, a K person and you’re fighting for your life are great.

But all these same conditions make it impossible to immediately recall what just occurred. So we say nothing and we just shut up. Don’t talk until your attorney can do the talking for you is what I always say. Only a fool Um, uh, would make statements without talking to their attorney first. Now, I just highlight this out, it’s kind of really, really deep.

In 2013, the United States Supreme Court in a ruling, Salinas v. Texas, said, If the police are asking us questions, and we haven’t been read Miranda, so these just, At doing an investigation, asking questions, and we just decide not to say anything, we shut up, ask us questions, do you know who had the gun, you say nothing.

Before Miranda, your silence can actually be used against you in court. Which I was stunned when the Supreme Court said this. After Miranda, and you read your rights, of course. Your silence can’t be used against you. But keep in mind that if they’re asking, the police are asking you questions after a shooting, kindly and politely say, I’m not going to say anything.

I’m going to invoke my, my fourth amendment rights until I have a chance to talk to my attorney or I’m invoking my right to remain silent. And that’s enough. And that’ll protect you against that. I always saw it in there. Hopefully it helps. Uh, I think it’s important to know, and remember all those, all those effects of the adrenaline and the impact of the, um, uh, threatening encounter.

You can’t prevent those from happening. Your body is going to do that. God created our bodies that way. And it happens to protect us, to help us, to make us better, faster, stronger. We can’t stop it. Now we can train to be able to react and act properly when those are happening. Um, but we can’t stop from happening.

The increased heart rate, the accelerated breathing, the blood vessels being constricted parts of the body being, uh, Restricted auditory exclusions. Has anybody been in a car accident or can remember as a kid falling out of a tree like me, I can remember auditory exclusion. I can remember everything echoing and sound like it’s a long ways away.

I was in a car accident where we rolled over the car and it was in slow motion. That’s again, part of something you’ll experience during a threatening encounter. Your body has all these reactions that allows you to act quickly and act properly. So it’s something that I’ve had as a kid. Falling out of trees a lot is probably a lot of the reason why I am the way I am, but at least, at least my parents will tell you that.

So some or all of these make it impossible for you to recall just what occurred. So a police officer coming up to you and saying, Hey, what just happened? How many times did you shoot? Where did he come from? What do you say to you? Where’s the gun? You have no idea. You have no recollection. You have no memory.

And so what happens is you give a statement. None of the statement is remotely true. Two or three days later, you meet with your attorney. Your memory is starting to come back. Sometimes it takes a few days, a few weeks, a few months. Sometimes it never comes back because of the trauma. And all of a sudden you have a totally different statement.

And then the prosecutor is going to say, well, what are you going to believe, the statement he gave right after the incident, or the statement three days later after he spoke to his attorney? Well, the one he believed is the statement three days later, because all the effects of a threatening encounter are over with, and you start to remember, and you can start to think about what happened.

That’s why the best advice you can get is don’t talk to, politely and kindly tell them. You have nothing to say until you have the opportunity to collect your thoughts and speak to an attorney. And also, I’d like to point out, if anybody in here is on beta blockers, they impact your sympathetic nervous system.

They make you react slower. And that’s something that you do, and that keeps her blood pressure lower. My doctor didn’t know that until I told her. So do you want to be in a fight for your life with your sympathetic nervous system impaired? Uh, I didn’t want to, so eventually I took myself off of them. Now, I told you, shut up, don’t talk to the police, make sure you talk to an attorney.

So how do we call 911 to summon help? When I just told you all that because make no mistake about it, folks, your first contact with police is a 911 call that 911 call is recorded all the time that 911 operator will be in court to testify against you, or maybe on behalf of you, but make no mistake about it.

The investigation begins during the 911 call and I have a seminar on how to handle the 911 call. I have 10 to 15 live 911 calls. Someone make you laugh, someone make you cry. Some are terrifying. The questions that you’re being asked when there’s a bad man in your house, uh, or your wife is hiding from the bad guy, hang up.

Call 9 1 1, tell them that there’s an intruder, and hang up and defend yourself, and we’ll talk about that. So how do you dial 9 1 1, summon help, and the attorney advises you to shut up? Based on everything we know from the impact of a threatening encounter and the psychological and physical impacts of that, how do we, how do we function properly?

Well, the first thing we do is we answer no questions that the 911 operators can ask. And they’re going to ask a lot of questions, but that’s not the purpose of us calling 911. We have one purpose of calling 911 and that’s to summon help. Period. It’s over. Hang up. You’re done. Hopefully you’re calling me, or another attorney, or you have a service like second call defense.

That’s why we’re second call. As soon as you call 911, your second call is to us, there’s an attorney on the line, and we take care of everything from there. So, if I call 911, My call is probably going to sound something like this. My name is Sean Maloney. I live at 223 South second Avenue, Hamilton, Ohio. I was inferred for my life.

There’s been a shooting. Send the ambulance police. I’m six two. I’m bald. I’ll be in a white t shirt and boxer shorts standing in my. Uh, driveway waiting for you. Now that’s one way it would go, and of course I’m not going to have my gun. Because think about it, the police are now rushing to a shooting, they’re amped up with the same adrenaline that I have, so all these people running around with firearms and me standing with a gun in my hand isn’t a good thing to do.

So if, if, if at all possible, you put that gun away. Now it can also be the threat’s gone, the threat’s been stopped, my wife is upstairs holding, holding the, uh, the attacker down with a gun, or to be. The attacker is still in my house, in the front of the room, and they’re going to start asking questions.

Well, you know what? You don’t have time to answer questions because you need 100 percent of your focus on protecting yourself. And I encourage you, I’ll talk to them and get that seminar here. I mean, a lot of it is very emotional to hear the stupid questions that 911 operators are asking. How’d they get there?

What color was the car they’re driving? And the woman said, I don’t know. He’s in my house trying to kill me and my children. Or it could be, I’m being attacked. I don’t know. There’s an intruder in my house. Send the police immediately. I live at 223 South 2nd Avenue. In Hamilton, Ohio. Actually, my childhood home was 223 South 2nd Avenue in Quarry, PA.

So that’s why I always use that so I don’t forget. I always try to give a shout out to Quarry, Pennsylvania every time I can, even though I’ve lived here longer than I’ve lived there. Now, when you hang up, I can guarantee something’s gonna happen. They’re going to call back. Don’t answer it because if you’re hopefully you’re talking to an attorney on the phone after you’ve used lethal force and self defense, or if somebody’s still in your house, you don’t have time to be on the phone.

You need 100 percent of your focus to be on the threat that’s currently in front of you. So the limited information we give is simply. Summon help. And that’s all we have to do. That’s all we’re required to do. And really by law, we’re not even required to call 9 1 1. I’ve had, I’ve talked with some attorneys that said, well, you know what, I don’t want my client to make that 9 1 1 call.

I want his wife or her husband. I want somebody else to make it. I don’t, I want you to say I was in fear of death or serious bodily injury and you know, I I, and there’s been a shooting sending Ann Wilson police ’cause they’re gonna have a chance to, to take statements as it is. But you wanna make sure you’re the first one out there calling for help and.

Also a good trick that 911 operators do, and police do, is that sometimes you get put on hold. You won’t believe how many times a 911 operator puts you on hold. Either they’re too busy, or sometimes they put you on hold to find out what they can find out. Just think about it. When they put you on hold, people think that you can’t hear.

Well, guess what? You’re still being recorded. So the whole time you’re on hold, it’s recording your entire conversation, all the background noise, and what’s going on. That’s always a little trick I always tell people. So, you know, you’re not alone. And trust me, in today’s day and age, you’re always being watched.

You’re always being listened to. These were the bane of our society, folks. Let me tell you something. We have no privacy whatsoever.

If you remember, I was in fear of death or serious bodily injury or harm, and to act accordingly, you should never be found guilty in a self defense shooting. And now this holds especially true if you have competent legal representation. Immediately after the 911 call, critically before you make any statements to the police, and yes, I include 911 operators in statements to the police.

That’s why they’re going to ask you every question. Who was it? Do you know him? What did you do? Where did they come from? Where are they driving? You have nothing to say. Probably you don’t know, you can’t answer those questions like what I talked about before. I always advise people to have an attorney you can call immediately after you’re forced to use lethal force.

And that’s why I created a site called offense probably in 2010. I got sick and tired of my clients not having the ability to bond themselves out. I’ve walked door to door with wives at 1 a. m. with their three little kids to get 10, 000 because the 19 year old husband was charged with felonious assault for brandishing a firearm and he legally brandished, but he was overcharged on a Friday night and he called me in tears and I knew Monday morning after we spent the weekend in Butler County Jail, he would never be the same.

And after after I went door to door to piggy banks to ATM machines, got the 10, 000 cash for the 100, 000 bond. I said, there’s got to be a better way. And that’s why I created something called offense. It was a better way. And it gives you legal protection immediately. Trust me. My wife will probably tell you I’ve spent more time in jail than my clients collectively, because I’m in there preparing them for arraignment hearings trial, because they can’t afford bond or bail.

I’d much rather be in my office, but, uh, they know me well about the county general and, uh, Hamilton County also. So I created a second called offense to protect law abiding gun owners. And there’s plenty of organizations like that out there. And I always say, okay, we’re forced to use the firearm as self defense.

Who are you going to call? You’ve been arrested, who’s going to call your family? Who’s going to arrange bail? Who’s going to find you an attorney? Who’s going to find you an attorney in Florida when you’re on vacation and you use a firearm as self defense? I’m sure we all know who we’re going to hire at home, or you have a general idea, or somebody you can call and say, Hey, I need an attorney, but who are you going to call in Yellowstone National Park?

If you’re forced to use a firearm for self defense. That’s why you need somebody to call. If you don’t have an attorney on speed dial, I always tell people, and you carry a gun for self defense, you’re a fool. Because there will be an investigation, you will be interrogated, you will be held, and being detained, and you may be arrested.

And there’s a lot that goes into making sure that’s the smooth and easy as a process as possible. And again, uh, SecondCallDefense. org. I have white papers, things I’ve written, things that you can learn and understand. Now the next thing I want to talk about is the Reasonable Man Doctrine. We’ve probably heard about the Reasonable Man Doctrine in civil cases a lot.

Essentially, uh, the Reasonable Man is, uh, What would a reasonable person do under the same or similar circumstances that you were in? If the reasonable person or the reasonable man would have done the same thing that you did, guess what? You get to sleep at home. But if you wouldn’t have, guess what?

You’re sleeping on a, on a bunk in jail. Now, just because I say I was in fear of immediate death or serious bodily injury or harm doesn’t make it so, especially if the police or the prosecutors don’t agree. There’s a lot that can go into a self defense case. I just wrote an appeal for a gentleman out of Akron, Ohio, who brandished his firearm.

Um, and again, he admitted everything he did, but the judge didn’t feel that there was some evidence of self defense. Now, either do I, but my job was to argue as best I could. And it’s important. Uh, that we know the way the laws operate, the way the laws work, and that we have attorneys that do also. You’d be very surprised how many attorneys out there have no idea about self defense laws or firearms laws in the state of Ohio.

How can they? They change so often. At this, this is all I do, so I have nothing better to do, so to speak, than, than pay attention to what’s going on. But please. Don’t use your cousin’s divorce attorney if you use a firearm of self defense. I can’t tell you how many times that’s happened, and I’ve had to come in and try to back clean up for that.

Make sure that you have a well respected criminal defense attorney, uh, on the other end of the line. So, how then does the trier of fact, the judge or jury decide if our actions were reasonable? You know, that’s the million dollar question. Uh, go to jail or go home. To each of us as people wanting to use lethal force in self defense, it’s a question you must be able to answer.

Why did you subjectively believe that you were in fear of death or serious bodily injury or harm? Now, hopefully you can tell me that, because if you can’t tell me why you shot him, her, or the 14 year old teenager boy from next door, Then how can you convince a jury if you can’t even tell me why you did that?

After all, you have to be able to justify your actions. So why? Let me tell you why. Because I was in fear of what? Death, serious body and injury harm. Now how do I convince a jury or a judge that I acted recently? Think about the acronym. op, uh, the, uh, forgot my acronym. Wow, that’s ’cause my head of myself.

I apologize. Ability. Opportunity and Jeopardy. Administration of Justice. So think about the administration of justice. A person had the ability to kill you, had the opportunity to kill you, and put you in jeopardy. Sean? Why did you use lethal force? Because I was in fear of death or serious bodily injury or harm.

Well, I understand that, but what made you feel that way? Well, he was standing in front of me with a knife in his hand, screaming, I’m going to kill you. So certainly he had the ability. I’m right in front of him, sitting in a chair, so obviously he had the opportunity. Jeopardy? He scared, I was terrified that he was going to kill me.

I was in fear of death or serious bodily injury or harm. So that’s how they all work. I was in fear of death or serious bodily injury or harm because the person had the ability. Had the opportunity and put me in jeopardy. That’s my case. As simple as it seems, there’s a lot of people that just throw everything on the wall.

Uh, they’re bad guys and they’re just, so they’re just going to say self defense, but they can’t prove any of that. And that’s the difference between good guys and bad guys. So remember that fictitious reasonable person is constructed and construed out of the morals and experiences of the people that live in your community.

Now, we can probably all say to each other right now, Yeah. Now, the reasonable person in Springdale, Ohio in this room isn’t the same reasonable person on the east side of Cleveland, in Chicago, Illinois, or in San Francisco. Can we say that we’re all different? So how if you’re on vacation and you find yourself in Chicago and somehow you can legally own a firearm, Or somewhere else.

Well, how do you, how do you prove that you’re the reasonable person when you really don’t think like these people, it’s simple, you need a criminal defense attorney from that area. That’s why I tell people having me on retainer does you no good if you’re on vacation, because you want somebody that donated to the judge’s campaign, went to the prosecutor’s birthday party, knows everybody there.

That’s who you want as an attorney. There’s so much more than just legal knowledge to be an effective advocate for your client. So you got to make sure that. Uh, you have somebody from that community that’s representing you that can show people that you’re just not some strange evil person from Springdale or from Cincinnati, Ohio.

You’re a good person. You just happen to be outside of your home element. So why did you do it? Well, let me tell you, because he had the ability to kill me, the opportunity to kill me, and he put me in fear of jeopardy or serious body injury or harm.

Now finally, we’re going to get the lethal force in the law, but we’ve all came in reform. Subjectively, I was in fear of death or serious bodily injury, and remember, it’s subjective, it’s how did you feel, what did you feel, it doesn’t matter how I felt, or how the judge felt, but what did you feel, and can you articulate that, and again, you think the administration of justice, the ability, opportunity, and jeopardy, that’s why you’re here tonight, and that’s what you have to remember, it’s kind of simple, so, like I said, I always fear that everybody goes home, but they never really know, and When they’re allowed to use lethal force and self defense.

I hope people have a better understanding right now. You have a right to use lethal force because you’re in fear of death. You’re about to be killed. The only way that you can avoid being killed or being injured severely is by taking the other person’s life. Or by using lethal force. It’s pretty clear that way.

I can’t do anything. We don’t have a duty to retreat in the state of Ohio. We removed that a few years back too. So we have no duty to retreat, but subjectively, we have no, we have no right to use lethal force until what? Until we determine that we’re in fear of death or serious bodily injury or harm.

Then in a state of Ohio, we are legally permitted to use lethal force to protect ourselves because. At that point in time without the duty retreat, that’s really the only way that we can protect ourselves. Is by using lethal force. So, so people who thought, and I, uh, represented the last two people that second call defense represented for, uh, using, uh, lethal force to self defense.

And in both cases, one in new Carlisle, Ohio, one in Columbus, Ohio, their assailants were killed by the second call defense members. And I always tell people. It was over in three seconds from beginning to end. So if you carry your firearm without a round in the chamber, you’re not going to make it. If you are going to determine whether you can use lethal force religiously, philosophically, as a human being, if you want to make that decision when this is happening, you’re not going to make it.

You need to have that discussion with yourself, with your spouse. With your inner being that your life is more important than somebody else’s. I can’t tell you how many people out there that will take a bullet and will die before they take another human life. I’m not that way. So I don’t understand now.

I want to come home and see my kids and soon my grandkids. So, you know, And I’m hopeful that everybody in this room feels the same way. You have to remember that that decision has to be made ahead of time because you will not have time to make it Columbus, Ohio client stops at a food truck to get food, orders his food, sits in his car.

He looks over in the parking lot. Three people are approaching him. He’s nervous. He’s a concealed carry holder. He was so nervous, his hair was standing up on his arms. When stuff like that happens, folks, it happens for a reason. So he took his firearm out and put it on his seat because he knew something was going to happen.

Well, they came up and said, man, our car is dead behind the UDF. Can you drive back there and jump our car? Nah, man, I’m not going to do that. I’m not going to go and do that. These are shady characters. Uh, Oh, come on, please. Just, Oh, it takes us right there. All I have to do is jump us. Well, he had just jumped his girlfriend’s car, so he knew the jumper cables were in his trunk.

He said, okay. So we drove behind there, pulled up front bumper to front bumper, got out of the car, popped his hood, went to the trunk to bend over and grab the jumper cables. He starts being pistol whipped. He turns around and as he turns around, the guy. It’s from me to you, shoots at him three times, misses.

Most people don’t look at the front site. So who knows what the gun was, but my client drew his firearm, shot him twice and killed him. So I get a call at about one o’clock in the morning from the Columbus homicide detectives. They tell me that. They have a gentleman, they tell me his name, they tell me what happened, he said we’re all about, he goes almost everything’s on camera because folks, you’re always on film.

Almost everything’s on camera, they only have a couple of questions, they went to ask him questions, but he took out this second call defense card that says, I’m not going to say anything until I talk to my attorney, so they called me. And I said, look, we can do it one of two ways. You guys can make my client comfortable.

I’ll drive to Columbus. I’ll be there in about an hour and a half hour and 40 minutes, or you can excuse yourselves and I can talk to my client and then he’ll have you come back in. And so they excuse themselves. My client told me everything that happened. And I said, okay, when I ask you a question, you pause and I’ll tell you whether you’re going to answer it or not.

Only a couple of simple questions and the questions related to the individuals that were with. The now deceit, the accessories, 14 and 16 year old accessories to an 18 year old that tried to commit murder. Guess what happened? Because the main guy died in the commission of a felony. The juveniles were charged with felony murder and they’re still in jail.

Any murder, any death that occurs during the commission of a felony, you can be charged with felony murder. So if a bunch of you guys go do something and someone dies, and you’re an accessory, felony murder. So that’s what happened there. Second one. Again, three seconds, he’s helping being a good guy, boom, it’s over.

He’s getting pissed the whip and shot at. And so he shoots, he returns fire. No decision time. No time to do anything. He didn’t have time to rack one in a chamber. He didn’t have time to do anything. He had time to live, and that was it. Second guy. Worked for Domino’s pizza, making pizza deliveries. He always, he was a concealed carry holder.

He always thought he would be robbed, mugged, or shot at on the streets, delivering pizza. He never thought that he would be back at Domino’s pizza at 11 o’clock after they had, you know, it shut the lights off, they’re all cleaning up and mopping, it wasn’t his job, but he was in there and I helped people mop up.

Well, the crew’s inside, and all of a sudden the door bursts open. People in masks, and hoodies on, with machetes, rushing at my client. Client’s, the guy’s about three feet away from my client, steps back, pulls his firearm, bang, bang, bang, and kills him. Accessory leaves. Small town. So whoever the accessory is, and they know who he is, but they don’t have proof yet, so they can’t arrest him, so he’s still out there.

He knows who killed his buddy, because he saw him do it. And I can go in and tell you a conversation on what’s been happening since then. They have DNA on the mask he left behind, but they don’t have probable cause yet to get a DNA sample. They’re waiting for that. So, I get a call from him at about 11. 30.

And I talked to him on the telephone for about an hour. He’s in the backseat of a cruiser, calls me, calls, second called offensive mercy hotline. They connect them to me and I’m talking to him. He tells me what happened. I, they put them in the back of the police car while they’re conducting an investigation while they’re interviewing everybody while the crime labs there and while everything else is going on.

So we’re having this conversation and, uh, the police getting into car. Start to ask some questions. I said, I said, officers, my name is attorney Sean Maloney. My client has nothing to say until I have the opportunity to speak with him and we’ll be happy to make an appointment and we’ll come in and make a statement.

And I said, I need you to do me a favor. I need you to drive him home and have someone else drive his car home. And I need you to park a car outside of his family’s residence because whoever the other accessory was is still out there. And I’m afraid for my client’s life. So, agreed, said fine, we’ll do that.

The next day, I drive up, I’m meeting my client and his mother, we go in, uh, to the conference room, where the detectives are asking questions, mostly, you know, benign questions, easy to answer, didn’t have any objections, uh, but there was one question that he didn’t ask, which I was surprised, he didn’t ask if he was in fear of death or serious bodily injury or harm.

Well, so we go and, uh, You know we’re miked because he goes in another office. Then he comes back in with one more question. Guess what that question was. Were you in fear of death or surest by the end of your harm? Yes. See you later. So that’s how important that is and that’s how easy it is But it can go the wrong way a lot and i’ve had it going the wrong way I was a consultant for a big montana the guy that said you son of a bitch you’re bleeding like a suck pig you should have Uh, I should have shot you again He had languished for three years And, uh, Dick Heller from Heller versus Washington DC gave me a call and said, Hey, can you try to help this guy out?

So I became the consultant. I got an expert witness that explained to the prosecutor during a pretrial, uh, the impact of a threatening accounting, the neurofrenephrine, the adrenaline, everything that happens. This was a small town, Pennsylvania. That was the first murder they ever had. He didn’t know what he was doing, but after this and after the cross examination of the real bad guy, he was over with.

Uh, so it’s important. The little things that are important, it’s as simple as being in fear of death or serious bodily injury or harm. How am I doing on time?

Okay,

same situation. Somebody’s standing in front of you. They’re screaming at you. I’m gonna kill you. They’re reaching in your shirt, they grab a cell phone, you shoot them. What would a reasonable man do? Well, chances are, under totality and circumstances, screaming, swearing, I’m gonna kill you, reaches in your pocket, pull something like that out.

Those fear, for the movements, and it’s happened many times. Under a reasonable person’s standard, I would have did that. Something I’d like to point out, the reasonable person would have believed that the cell phone was a knife, a gun, a club, a beer bottle, a pen. Under most circumstances, if the perception is that a reasonable person would have acted in self defense, under all those circumstances, taking them together, despite the fact that it wasn’t a gun, it was a cell phone.

That’s going to be rule justifiable. You got to remember, we’re the innocent victims who use lethal force to protect our gift of life. That’s all. That’s the only reason why we do that. And it’s getting more and more important that we’re prepared to do that. We’re in a society now that I can’t tell, I could, we could spend 18 hours together and I could talk to you about what I’ve seen since I first walked into a courtroom in 1991 as a young attorney.

Unbelievable. Even the bad guys had respect, didn’t wear their hats, treated the police with respect, their attorneys with respect. Now, I’ve seen clients attack their attorneys, attack the police, attack the judges, attack the witnesses, attack the victims.

So remember when we talk about opportunity, the aggressor was close enough to use their ability against me. Now that can change depending upon what their ability is. The ability of having a firearm versus a baseball bat is different. It may be 20 feet away with a firearm. Well, I’m a little worried with a baseball bat.

I got less than a second. He can rush me. Or there’s a guy. On the other side of North and Boulevard and all this construction screaming at me when I get over there, I’m going to kill you. Well, I can’t take pot shots between the car because really, you know, the ability may be there, but the opportunity is not there yet.

So depending upon what their weapon is kind of changes what the opportunity and what the ability for them has. But when he’s right there in front of me, 10 feet away with that same gun or that same knife, well, that’s a whole different story.

What’s grave bodily injury? You’re gonna hear that term comes out of Latin. Black slide definition, it refers to serious, important, weighty, momentous, great, grave, as a phrase, serious bodily harm. So when you’re thinking about serious bodily harm, it’s pretty bad. It’s a broken jaw. It’s a bashing of skull.

It’s a broken arm. And ladies, Rape is always, always, always death and serious bodily injury or harm. No question about it. And please understand, nobody in this room has to wait to be hit with a baseball bat, has to wait to be raped, has to wait to be fired at. You have the opportunity and the ability to be in fear of death and serious bodily injury or harm and act.

Act immediately. You don’t have to wait. The fact that subjectively, you’re in fear is enough. There are some people that don’t do, and I’m not going to do anything until I get hit. Well, if you get hit just right, that’s probably the last time you’re going to get hit.

So remember, everything changes with the right tool, a pen, a pocket knife, a belt buckle, the frozen bag of squirrels. Whatever it is, it changes slightly when you can use lethal force, and when we decide to use lethal force. And remember, it’s subjective to each of you. I mean, I could use a firearm or self defense at a situation that somebody else would laugh at.

It depends upon your experience. Navy SEAL versus Destruction worker, somebody that knows karate, somebody that fights, a prize fighter, somebody that’s trained to use firearms. With everybody’s different abilities, it changes when somebody can subjectively be in fear of death or serious bodily injury or harm.

Now, I also like to talk about, I tussed upon it, duty to retreat and no duty to retreat. In the state of Ohio now, uh, we have no duty to retreat. I don’t know, time, since I’m old now, time flies. Uh, it seems like it was only a few years ago. That we had a duty retreat in Ohio, and if you can remember that, if you’re sitting in your house, watching TV, eating popcorn with the kids, and someone kicks your front door open, you didn’t have a right to defend yourself, if you had a reasonable opportunity to retreat and run out the back door.

To me, that was ridiculous. And finally, we changed that, and we were one of the last states to do that also. So, uh, but make sure that you know, handgunlaw. us, if you’re carrying with reciprocity, if you’re in a duty retreat state, or a no duty retreat state. That’s important because if there’s some possibly now this is something even as an attorney.

I don’t understand. I’ve made this objective decision that I’m in fear of death or serious bodily injury or harm right now. How in the world am I going to escape? I can’t figure that out. I mean, right there. I’m in fear of death right now. It can happen at any moment. Uh, maybe there’s a situation where I can quickly shut the door and it’s bulletproof.

I don’t know, but I always point that out. And the due to retreat state, once you make the decision that you’re in fear of death and serious bodily injury harm, you have one more decision to make, and that is, can I safely retreat? And when I say safely, it’s 32 degrees out, I’m on bare feet, I could, I could, and I could, Clearly run out the back door in the snow.

No, that’s not safe. One hair on your head is, well, one hair used to be on my head, damaged. You know, you can’t safely retreat.

I think at last count, there’s approximately 27 states that have passed no duty to retreat. Uh, 13 states impose a duty to retreat. And they’re the suspect states that you’re all thinking about. And ten, ten and a half cast of doctrine. Some states like New Mexico, for example, they have, um, No duty to retreat, but it’s not by statute.

It’s by case law. So you kind of have to, uh, be aware of your state laws and what’s happening. But again, uh, www. handgunlaw. us is the key. If you’re going on vacation, you’re snowbirds, you’re heading to Florida, look up each state on the way, having a car, you know, if it’s an open carry state, you know, when you can carry a firearm, how you can do it concealed, how you can take care of yourself.

It’s pretty easy now.

A couple things I want to ask. Can we take a few minutes for questions? Okay. Anybody have any questions? Yes, red shirt first. Just a second, please.

Um, you just mentioned castle doctrine for the first time. Uh, doesn’t that somewhat change things when you’re in your house and somebody busting through the front door? Castle doctrine has completely changed everything. It’s a, it’s a stand your ground in your house and castle doctrine was the first thing in Ohio pass.

Essentially, if someone is in your house that doesn’t have a right to be there and wasn’t invited, the presumption is they’re there to hurt you and you can do, and you can use lethal force and self defense. So, uh, when you think about no duty retreat, it’s like you’re putting your Castle Doctrine jacket on, and you’re going outside.

Now, remember when Castle Doctrine first went into place? Castle Doctrine applied to your house, and to your car, and to an immediate relative’s car. That’s all been changed now. We have a right to use lethal force no matter where we are. Uh, there was two cases in, in, in the state of Ohio. One in the 1st District in, uh, Cincinnati.

One in the 12th District, which is eight counties up in Middletown, 12th District Court of Appeals. One person used the Castle Dock as a defense in his girlfriend’s car, even though they had three kids but weren’t married. No close family member. He couldn’t use it. And then a husband and wife using the castle doctrine in an automobile So luckily that’s gone, but that’s a good question castle doctrine protects us in the home The presumption is but it’s rebuttable by a prosecutor But the presumption is that a person was in that house to do you harm and you have a right to protect it We have another question here long.

First of all, thank you for for coming tonight uh, just Two days ago, I worked downtown and I don’t carry my firearm downtown, but I do have a pocket knife. Uh, I was sitting in an area one o’clock in the afternoon, a renovated area, a nice area. Um, and in my distance, I could hear just, you know how that guttural screaming and the sharp F word.

And I could see somebody in my peripheral, but I kept looking at my phone because I knew if you ignore them, It’ll help. Uh, well, he had passed me and since I didn’t give him any attention, he said stuff like, yeah, I said you and he started coming towards me and I don’t know how I was so calm. I just lightly stood up and when I stood up, he, he then, he kept the, the hardcore.

Or cursing, uh, but then faded away. But had he kept coming with like no physical firearm or anything and I had my firearm, is that something that I could defend myself or even my knife? I was just. You know, beside myself, hands and feet are enough. And again, it comes down to what were you in fear of death or suicidal injury or harm?

And if at a point in time, he came at you, went and stop, and you said, stop, stay away. And he kept approaching you or whatever the circumstances were. Did he have the ability to harm you with his hands or his feet? Did he have the opportunity to do that to you? And was he acting in a threatening manner?

And then were you in jeopardy or fear of death or serious bodily injury or harm?

So folks, and the thing is not everybody, everything’s black and white, but again, I just gave you the building blocks. He was in fear of death or serious bodily injury or harm. The person was younger, stronger, bigger, had The ability to do him harm was right in front of him, had the opportunity, kept approaching him in a threatening manner.

If you had a firearm and you’re saying, stay back, stay back, and he keeps coming, then certainly you can be in fear of death or sure spotting your harm. And I always like to point out, I represent a lot of people who brandish. Uh, it’s estimated that, uh, firearms are used an estimated 5 million times in America in self defense.

The vast majority of those are, hey, I have a gun. I have a gun and it’s over with because trust me, I’ve represented a lot of criminals. They don’t get out of bed in the morning to die any more than you or I do. That’s why when a state enacts concealed carry, violent crimes go down markedly immediately because they don’t know who has a gun and who doesn’t have a gun.

Mostly when someone branches a firearm, they’re gone. Uh, Mostly, you’ll find that criminals, or I’ve found over years and years of practice, is they have very low self esteem. They only feel good about themselves when they’re robbing, raping, beating. When they can take advantage of somebody. But as soon as you stand up to them, ladies, when you look at them as they’re walking by, you say, How you doing?

Scares the hell out of them. They don’t want anything to do with you. They want victims. They don’t want someone that’s going to stand up to them. So always remember that. And that’s a good question because that’s something, and, so how do we practice using lethal force? Can’t go shooting everybody up, can we?

But we can take situations like that and say, what would I do? At what point in time would I feel that I was in fear of death or search by injury or harm? You can put those in any situation, walk down the street, always take corners wide so you can see what’s around it. Refuse to be a victim. Uh, I can give you a literature on refusing to be a victim and always be ready.

But think about that. I tell people always being in condition yellow, but How do we practice? Well, we’re watching something on TV, a crime show, and we say, what would I do? Well, how could I defend myself? So that’s how we practice. We’ve got some online questions.

Separating my thumb from the blade’s got me to see from the back. So yeah, the fear and the hate. Well, what happens if I

You need to be in fear, at least in fear of death or serious bodily injury, you’re in fear. And you did that because your next step, I always tell people, if you draw a firearm, somebody’s in fear of death and serious bodily injury or harm. So if you pull it, you better be ready to use it because you’re the one who started this whole thing.

So, but my first thing to you is, you have no clue what’s going on. You need to get rid of your cell phone. If someone comes up behind you and taps you on the shoulder, this person walking down the street, that’s how people get in trouble. I’m not picking on you, but even when we’re sitting out in public on our cell phone, oblivious to what’s going on around us, we can’t be that way.

So we have three online questions. Our first one, you’ve kind of already touched on. Um, they’re asking what is legally brandishing your gun or firearm? What is legally brandishing your gun or firearm? It could be something as simple as, Hey, I have a gun. Or hey, I have a gun. Uh, the gentleman I, uh, wrote the appeal for in Akron, uh, guys in a pickup truck, road rage, guy never got out of the pickup truck.

Uh, they’re screaming back and forth and. Client never admitted after question by everybody, were you in fear of death or serious bodily injury or harm? No. Were you going to shoot him? No. So he walked back to his car, grabbed his firearm from underneath the seat, and says, Hey, you might want to think about this.

Puts it, puts it back. Well, that was a flawless assault. It’s what he was charged with because he admitted I wasn’t in fear of death or serious bodily injury and the prosecutor asked him a few times and he said no. So it’s kind of a fine line but if you’re in fear and you can say hey he had the ability the opportunity and put me in jeopardy then that’s fine because police officers out there realize that fire brandishing firearms are done hundreds of thousands of times and that’s never reported.

My advice to you is if you ever are forced to brandish a firearm Be the first person to make the call, call the non emergency phone number. Because remember that kid I told you where I was going house to house with his wife and kids to collect money for bond, he drove to the Fairfield police department because he grew up in Fairfield.

He drove there. Well, guess what happened when he pulled up in his F 150 four door pickup truck and got out, they were going out looking for the F 150 four by four black pickup truck and tackled him in the yard because the true bad guy called and blamed everything on my client. So you want to be the first person because chances are if you’re the first person who makes the phone call, you’re the good person.

Our second, thank you Sean, uh, our second online question is could it be considered to be self defense if you’re in a situation that dogs are running to attack you and you are in fear of your life? Yes, absolutely. I have, uh, uh, through second called offense, represented it and then referred to an attorney in Georgia.

Him and his wife were walking down the street with their two smaller dogs and a pit bull on chain came walking, running around the corner, uh, client pulled his firearm, shot the firearm, just able to shot the dog. Disable the dog, grab basically one of the smaller dogs out of his mouth and a dog kept coming at him, shot him again.

Um, so that, that is self defense, self defense, whether it’s against, uh, uh, an animal or a person. Our, our, our third online question is the last one that we have. What do you think about carrying a burner launcher, which is legal in every state with no background check needed? Carrying a what? Burner launcher.

Tear gas, Connecticut. Uh, I guess if it’s illegal in any state, you can do what you want. But if I’m in fear of death or serious by under your harm, then I’m about to be killed. And I, I, I don’t, and I guess you can use less than lethal force if that’s what that is. I’m not familiar with it. Uh, you can use less than lethal force, but why would you use left less than lethal force if you’re in fear of death or serious about injury harm, and a person’s gonna kill you?

So, but yeah, I mean, if it’s legal to use, you can do whatever you want, but, but I wouldn’t do that. I know open carry is legal in the state of Ohio, uh, for tactical reasons. I don’t open carry a number one. If I’m in UDF and a place is being robbed, who’s the first person that’s going to be shot. The guy that has a handgun on his side of his belt.

So tactically, I don’t like it. Yes. We’ll take one more question. I had the impression you said to us that if you’re, you’re in a situation where you’ve shot somebody and, uh, the police come and start asking you a bunch of questions before they read your Miranda rights, that you have to answer them. No, before they read your Miranda rights, you have to tell them that you’re invoking your constitutional rights, not the answer.

That’s speaking. You got to say something. That’s what you’re saying. Exactly. You have to firmly, you have to firmly state that I’m invoking my constitutional rights, or I’ll be happy to cooperate after I speak to my attorney. This is one of those classes I hate to bring an end to. I think we could have Sean in sometime just for Q& A.

We can go out in the parking lot too and continue this. Well, as you know, we’d like to have Sean and every couple of years, because he is the expert and we always learn something from him. So, Sean, thank you so much for coming in again tonight.

And folks, you heard me talk a lot about second call defense. It’s something I believe in. And it used to be, I never talked about my company when I did this. And I do these all over the country, mostly because I didn’t want to take away with what the information I just gave you, but you are a fool if you don’t have an attorney on speed dial, or if you don’t have some kind of protection, second call defense offers you unlimited criminal defense, whatever it takes to bond you out of jail.

Whatever it takes to defend you in court, and then they have unlimited civil protection also, because a lot, a lot of times it’s not over with after you’re acquitted, uh, families like to try to sue somebody it’s getting harder and harder to do that, but please consider joining something or somebody, or I have a bunch of cards outside, take the card, uh, call me if you ever have any questions, certainly feel free to call me, uh, if you ever force use of firearm or self defense, but second call defense, you’re going to get me 99 percent of the time Or one of the other attorneys and that works anywhere you are in the United States.

So, uh, we’ll get attorneys for you on vacation, wherever you are. And I encourage anybody that carries on a regular basis to carry with reciprocity in other States, because I used to say, uh, before my daughter was 21, I was hoping there was a good guy or a good girl with a gun out there was going to save her life someday.

Because she couldn’t. So, you know, the life you save is most likely going to be your own, but you never know, you can change somebody else’s life. So thank you very much. And thanks for coming and spending time with us tonight.

For the people online, we will put Sean’s, uh, information on there for you to get us since you’re not here to pick up a card. Thank you for coming and we’ll see you next week, hopefully.